Drahflow

6 ms·

1.
by Drahflow 3mo ago
Zero to two, depending on how you count, exactly. It's a side-project from our consultancy work. We're two deep technologists and so far entertaining the notion that we're very bad at (product) sales. But we're trying to
2.
by Drahflow 3mo ago
Continuing to work on a high-performance observability / log analysis SaaS: https://logging24.com/landing_a/ The basic idea is to make Regex-scans so fast/cheap that "a metric" can be anything numer
3.
by Drahflow 1y ago
> in cost and resource usage Nah, it's fine. Storage of raw logs is pretty cheap (and I think this is widely assumed). For querying, two problems arise: 1. Query latency, i.e. we need enough CPUs to quickly return a result. This is
4.
by Drahflow 1y ago
The point that the trinity of logs, metrics and traces wastes a lot of engineering effort to pre-select the right metrics (and labels) and storage (by having too many information triplicate), is a good one. > We believe raw data based ap
5.
by Drahflow 6y ago
I'd be curious how you think about my favorite version: https://pastebin.com/raw/dXdZXnux
6.
by Drahflow 8y ago
I had basically the same problem as OP some years back. Then I wrote down, for each and every task, how much I'd value having already completed it (including how much I'd value having experienced doing it), and how long I estimate
7.
by Drahflow 9y ago
I usually try leave work-time flexible in contracts. Would be cool to have "up to X hours/week" as availability option.
8.
by Drahflow 11y ago
My school used the products from https://iserv.eu/ They sell a complete software solution for servers at schools.
9.
by Drahflow 11y ago
;) Yes. It works exactly as you envisioned it. You can do it with pretty much everything, actually: |dump =*clap [ "pa" |dump /tsch < > 0.0 ] ==slow slow clap # [ # "pa" # <function: 0000600
10.
by Drahflow 11y ago
I think it's a good thing (tm) that { x sin } could be valid code with x pushing the value of x whereas sin is executing the value of sin. Theoretically speaking, I need at least the deff and defq distinction, otherwise { } could not
11.
by Drahflow 11y ago
There are semicolons :) They do sequential function composition: { /foo dump } /f defv { /bar dump } /g defv f g ; /h deff h # "foo" "bar"
12.
by Drahflow 11y ago
The storage is exactly the same, the difference is only in what will happen if the name is encountered somewhere. { 2 } /putTwoOnStack deff { 2 } /putClosureOnStack defv putTwoOnStack dump # 2 putClosureOnStack dump # <fu
13.
by Drahflow 11y ago
It is self targeted snark allright. Not just not doing it with LISP, but also ignoring pretty much everything I learned about compiler building in university.
14.
by Drahflow 11y ago
The README claims easy Domain-specific-language creation. Here is a concrete example how code which utilizes these features looks like: https://gist.github.com/Drahflow/c463717d5c72e114ac63
15.
by Drahflow 11y ago
Define "inspired". I became aware of Forth while implementing Elymas. But the decision to make it stack based was actually because I was too lazy (after some attempts) to implement a correct LALR-parser-generator.
16.
Show HN: Self-hosted stack-based programming language(github.com)
86 points by Drahflow 11y ago|23 comments
17.
Germany gets Internet Censorship(zeropaid.com)
5 points by Drahflow 17y ago|0 comments