DjDarkman

8 ms·

1.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
I personally love language constructs and hate frameworks for not using them just because they are not OOP enough, for example I like to write controllers using switch statements... when it gets cluttered I may refactor it a class, but I ke
2.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
> Also, nothing would ensure that the electronic money you accumulate would hold its value, and nothing would prevent the operators of the platform from issuing more, in the first instance to themselves. Nothing prevents the government
3.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
I am ranked 2 in 3v3 Random Gold league. I think SC let's you learn how to play mind games, one of the ways to win a match is to understand what your opponents will think or do and play against that, surprise them, do something they would n
4.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
My advice is take jQuery Mobile, extract the parts you care about and build your web app your own way. You don't have to use the whole thing. I agree with not trying to emulate native apps.
5.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
Yes, it's just a poor excuse for trying to take control over the web. If they would really care about the so called cyber security they would help people learn to make it more secure.
6.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
I implied that they could be more civil if there is a chance that the owner of the internet connection is not the criminal. They could knock on the door, politely ask the owner to answer some questions and do the rough stuff after they are
7.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
Reminds me of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wS5xOZ7Rq8
8.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
My hypocrisy sensor went off. They should take a look at Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty, Blood Rayne to name a few. In these games people kill people, they slice and dice them, why not complain against those. Aren't those games sending the wro
9.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
All they had to do is simply check if the guy had an unprotected wifi signal or not, but it was much easier breaking down the poor man's door and harrasing him.
10.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
They didn't have much of a choice, either that or they would have been burned for being a heretic. More thought: Religion preaches that we should simply accept stuff as fact without proof. The Bible condemns knowledge, it says that we are a
11.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
No sane person can take the bible literally. It's a piece of paper containing text that was written long ago when people didn't had this much technology.
12.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
I do the same it's really expressive IMHO, it's strange at start but when you understand it it's awesome.
13.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
Stopped reading here: > Dilbert creator and sexist jackass who last month opined that "women are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently," This articl
14.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
I wonder what would Microsoft do with all those Androids and iPads out there. It seems that they are having a real hard time realizing that for once in a life, this is not about them :)
15.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
No you are not, check this out: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/07/19/how-to-use-css3-m...
16.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
If you have to that please include a way to disable or, it or simply do a proper job with media queries.
17.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
The problem is that browsers don't deal with libraries. You can implement a module and a script loader system, but in the end of the day you will concatenate most scripts for faster download and initial page rendering. The big problem is th
18.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
Silverlight: Polluting the mind of the commoner, making them believe it's the hottest shit since slice bread and that everything else is inferior. Then realizing that this cross-microsoft-platform wonder is just a bad flash imitation, then
19.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
I didn't say dead, I said deprecated.
20.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
So apps for WP7 are going to be built with Moonlight?
21.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
I fail to see the point to this, Silverlight was deprecated by Microsoft in favor of HTML5, end of story.
22.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
I stopped reading here: > Douglas can explain to me why he keeps writing about object users as "attackers" and "tamperers". Maybe it's a reflection of childhood trauma that manifests itself as a pathological distrust that he's strugglin
23.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
I looked up the characteristics in wikipedia, all applies for me except for one: > Behave calmly and with restraint. They walk, eat and talk slowly. I actually move fast phased and I may even look nervous, I feel that I need to keep the
24.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
If PHP sucks so badly, why is it so popular? :) You can call PHP anything you want but, the fact remains: it's easy to learn, and it gets the job done. It's not meant to be OOP like, if you want to go crazy with OOP, then go with a strongly
25.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
Is it just me or this should have been a crazy rant about how much outsourcing sucks? I don't want to sound like a racist(don't take this the wrong way), but I had a lot of projects where the client previously employed Indians to do it, who
26.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
Women and men are not equal and never will be, period, anyone disputing that is ignorant. There is no problem with treating two genders differently to a certain point. Scott Adam was right, but he was overwhelmed by the zealots and had no c
27.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
I'm kind of disappointed, it lacks object patterns and closures furthermore: sometimes you need to create functionality and there is no plain HTML way out ie: when you want to 'backport' something to IE.
28.
by DjDarkman 15y ago
This article is ridiculous and pointless JavaScript hate article. JavaScript is not different from HTML and CSS, all of these are generated by a sometimes proprietary service and executed in the browser. This article is completely stupid be
29.
Why are you still using XHTML?(blog.istvan-antal.ro)
1 points by DjDarkman 15y ago|0 comments
30.
by DjDarkman 16y ago
> It in no way implies that every private venue (e.g. Facebook) is required to accomadate your opinions. If Facebook is a communication medium it must not hinder free speech.

More ›