Disposal8433

5 ms·

1.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
Which ones and what are those exclusive features that GitLab doesn't have?
2.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
Flagged because: > what if we could run only the relevant E2E tests The real title should be "Using Claude Code to Reduce E2E Tests by 84%."
3.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
Killing robots made by slaves. Where do I sign up?
4.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
> If outages [...] stop whole companies in their tracks They should fucking learn how to code because no one in their right mind would depend on such an external service that can be easily replaced by cloning repos locally or using proxi
5.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
What do you suggest? Some kind of std::const_reference<Type>? Clang-tidy is enough in addition to the reviews.
6.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
It's perverse and disgusting. Also what about lazy students, neurodivergent, or poor people that are most likely not having a good outcome despite learning? In the end even average students would be ignored by the teachers. What about
7.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
He's even more wrong when the Python typing system allows us to catch bugs in small scripts.
8.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
Like obfuscating text on Twitter, GitHub gists, or using an unreliable E2E encrypted service? > without creating accounts or relying on any platform to keep it safe You're still restricted to places where your JS decryption function
9.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
I had the same reaction. It's a big stretch to call a "tool" 500 lines of JS that could be replaced with a few Bash calls, a regexp, or a small self-contained Python+UV script. Even worse when it's limited in functionali
10.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
It is prohibiting in a few ways: relying on a company in a foreign country, and no alternative if your account gets randomly banned. Also what would happen to developers in embargoed countries? Those are unacceptable to developers outside o
11.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
Or yours...
12.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
They remove your privacy to make you think that your not worthy and that there is this pyramid. It worked! I don't use Google's products either. As for Microsoft and other big companies, they deserve the same hate.
13.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
Will the LLM take responsibility for the bugs and bad code introduced by the review? If it does and I'm free, then go for it.
14.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
> deep understanding It took me less than one day to switch from git.
15.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
> Since jj doesn't have names branches False. You need to call `jj branch set -r@ XYX` manually which can be a PITA but you only need to do that once you push. Or there is `jj git push --named XYZ=@` which moves the branch.
16.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
IIRC it's push force with lease, ie non destructive push force. No one will be bothered or notice what you did. And if you have conflicts, it's really easy to rebase and fix any issue.
17.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
It's called "reviewing code." I'm not taking any kind of responsibility for code that I haven't written myself.
18.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
> AI-enabled <something> 1. Scrum-enabled 2. Blockchain enabled 3. Web3 enabled 4. AI-enabled
19.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
You created an AI-generated coloring book. Is it a way to farm karma?
20.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
You didn't answer OP's questions. It's not authentication at all.
21.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
What's your astrological sign?
22.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
> three personas for software engineers The kind of psycho-bullshit that we should stay away from, and wouldn't happen if we respected each other. Coming from Microsoft is not surprising though.
23.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
AI + subscription + tool that can be replaced with a simple notebook: spam. Also, what happened to https://contactconverter.app/ ? Were you bored already or wanted to scam more people with an AI application?
24.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
> the obvious problems can mostly be solved by having the agent try to compile the program The famous "It compiles on my machine." Is that where engineering is going? Spending $billions to get the same result as the laziest dev
25.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
You can't disagree with facts. Every time I try to give a chance to all those LLMs, they always use old APIs, APIs that don't exist, or mix things up. I'll still try that once a month to see how it evolves, but I have never b
26.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
> Nowadays, it is better to write prompts Very big doubt . AI can help for a few very specific tasks, but the hallucinations still happen, and making things up (especially APIs) is unacceptable.
27.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
What's wrong with LibreOffice?
28.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
> I’d really appreciate feedback It's a spam generator. I'll stay polite and stop there.
29.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
I don't care about LLMs being integrated everywhere. It's a stupid idea but we can't prevent it. As for the AI-bros full of FOMO, they are wrong as usual. IF it stays as it is, anyone will learn to use those tools in a few ho
30.
by Disposal8433 1y ago
Sandboxing should prevent most of those issues. We can't control the users giving permissions to everything, but with more control on those permissions, or disabled by default, a phone should stay pretty safe, or am I missing something

More ›