Deprecate9151

8 ms·

1.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
I want to call this out because I see this advice a lot (and it's also my backup plan). Trade work can be a fantastic way to earn a living, but it is HARD work. It will break your body if you do it for your whole life. There is a reaso
2.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
They could open the cases, but this decision hinged on the permitting process not following the law that it needed to consider emissions, which the Rights of the Chile was a component of. It is not a given the reasoning used in this decisio
3.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
It may functionally stop all new projects (although I doubt that it will get that far). I don't see anything implying that existing projects approved under the old framework would need to be re-assessed and shutdown though. That was my
4.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
It does not seem so, the artcile indicates the court focused on procedural issues related to the impact assessment required for the permits to build the new oil locations. The issues seems to be focused on the fact they weren't done, o
5.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
Reading the article, none of that seems to be in scope for the decision. The decision seems to focus on the fact these new locations didn't adequately meet their existing impact analysis requirements in the first place, not that the im
6.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
And reading up after this comment led to me learning some people make a distinction that latches are level triggered and flip-flops are edge triggered. I think I remember my digital logic professor using both. I don't recall there ever
7.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
I'm not sure if this will help since it sounds a bit different than what I experienced, but try changing the battery. Our copy had some odd behavior when it started dying, but hadn't completely failed yet.
8.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
I think for the pharmacists its simply economics. It's cheaper to have 3 or 4 pharmacists and a bunch of much lower payed techs on staff to do the work manually then develop and maintain automation while complying with existing regulat
9.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
I was at a company where that exec won. In this case it was the Infosphere suite to replace a fully mature Informatica/Teradata environment and fix all the "issues". Obviously the issues were all design and management, not te
10.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
I used to work at a large insurance company with a COBOL core system. I completely agree with this. They paid for people who knew all the undocumented idiosyncrasies and foot-guns in the code. Not just "Knowing COBOL". A decent pr
11.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
It doesn't, I'm just expanding on why a specific cell meeting the program specifications "usually" wouldn't really move the need for the FCC analysis.
12.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
That isn't a quibble, the 100/20 requirement was a key requirement they set themselves. Regardless though, I was wrong about the buildout reasoning. The FCC just doesn't believe, based off the information provided by Starlink
13.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
Yeah I messed that up. After reading more the denial was focused on the fact that Starlink didn't refute they were not consistently delivering speeds and latency that matched the tier they bid on, and their plan to bridge that gap wasn
14.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
It is difficult, but the program (theoretically, since the program isn't at that stage yet) has checkpoints to address failure to actually deliver. This stage was to focus on if the bid accepted based off of the short-form proposal wa
15.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
Can't disagree there. That is why I actually like the approach in the RDOF. It has regular progress check-ins built in, instead of the seemingly no strings attached grants given historically. This stage two review was "are you lik
16.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
They didn't decide now. The program was created as a two step process initially. Starlink succeeded in the first round, but was denied in the second, more in depth, review that lead to the rejection. This was basically an appeal of tha
17.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
The Commission decision does address this. Unfortunately the section is redacted of specific details, but it appears Starlink argued that it's second gen satellites would be launched via Starship and address these issues. However, they
18.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
That argument is a red herring. The RDOF program is concentrated in specific geographic areas. Starlink onboarding subscribers in other areas doesn't really have a bearing on this program if they can't prove they can extend that t
19.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
For this grant the 100/20 needed to be consistently available in specific geographic areas. So if the cells bring down the performance averages are concentrated in those grant areas, it makes sense for them to fail to meet the program
20.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
That was not the terms, there were buildout requirements attached that started when the bid was accepted. https://www.usac.org/high-cost/funds/rural-digital-opportuni... Looks like Starlink was supposed to be 40%
21.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
Here's a link to the FCC attempt to preempt the law https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-order-preempting-t... And the appeals decision overturning the preemption https://law.justia.com/cases&
22.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
It's definitely endemic, I was just commenting on a particular subset of extremism.
23.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
This letter is particularly concerning when you consider there are individuals represented by this org who also believe in the Constitutional Sheriff theory. They want to be lords of a fife, not law enforcement.
24.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
Have you read, or at least read about, The Silmarillion? Your assumption about their trauma is very correct.
25.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
Sure, maybe there isn't, I can't argue that with my knowledge. What I am confident on is there won't be significant societal change with that level of evidence. Most of those health issues have "easy" reasons they c
26.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
This is a big part of the struggle with in vitro vs in vivo studies. We can have a repeatable result with in vitro effects, but can't confidently say what the macro effect will be. We might be able to say it doesn't "directly
27.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
I encourage you to learn more about the history of labor relations, especially since the 1700s.
28.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
Strikes are to thank for that.
29.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
It's going to widely vary by local jurisdiction. In the US though, generally building codes would end at the recepticle. If this was hard-wired it would probably be an issue for the inspector, but otherwise it would be out of scope.
30.
by Deprecate9151 3y ago
The technical term for it is "disgorgement" and it does exist in some contexts. I agree it is shockingly absent in far too many.

More ›