Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
DelightOne
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
DelightOne
2mo ago
Prefix caching automatically detects priorly read tokens -> more fained grained checkpoints then. With prefix caching you don't have to ask for a checkpoint, its automatic. One way or the other, a prefix is saved. Only the additiona
2.
▲
by
DelightOne
2mo ago
With prefix caching, you get checkpoints for free. Do you mean that?
3.
▲
by
DelightOne
2mo ago
Are you able to just re-run the data for the timeframe, or is "fixing it" a more manual process? And what observability are you working with into the process?
4.
▲
by
DelightOne
4mo ago
That's what install outside of the App Store is for. On your own risk-
5.
▲
by
DelightOne
4mo ago
I don't want random apps to paste potentially dangerous things into other apps. Its understandable. Imagine a banking app, and for example an IBAN field.
6.
▲
by
DelightOne
8mo ago
So if they played a short annoncement beforehand so people know its an Original, it would be fine? Originals get advertised heavily, next-movie, so I assume putting it in the same playlist is fine.
7.
▲
by
DelightOne
8mo ago
Amazon Originals, Netflix Originals. Disney Originals. Paramount Originals. I'm just wondering what is different between series and music, that for music its very bad morally to create your own and to put your own in the front row. Whi
8.
▲
by
DelightOne
8mo ago
Isn't that how every streaming service does it?
9.
▲
by
DelightOne
9mo ago
In what environment do you run such tests? Do you have a script for it, or do you have a UI that manages the process?
10.
▲
by
DelightOne
11mo ago
> This time, I tried to learn from that: facts are stored as instants, reasoning happens in local days of the jurisdiction that cares. I think that's how the JavaScript Temporal proposal works. Convert your instant to the timezone,
11.
▲
by
DelightOne
11mo ago
They don't wanna be like Facebooks' .1%.Thy know your user.
12.
▲
by
DelightOne
11mo ago
The threat already silences the opposition. You don't have to use it to silence people.
13.
▲
by
DelightOne
1y ago
I bet they tried an llm scam detector. It was too good so they didn't put it into production.
14.
▲
by
DelightOne
1y ago
Its death by a thousand cuts.
15.
▲
by
DelightOne
1y ago
Making people able to sue for anyone feeling bad about not having gotten the job is a path you should not take. We have something similar in Germany and its horrible for companies. Leeches bleeding you dry.
16.
▲
by
DelightOne
1y ago
How does an e2e test for less capable LLMs look like, you call each LLM one by one? Aren't these tests flaky by the nature of LLMs, how do you deal with that?
17.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
Congratulations! I've got a small question. How do you deal with people asking for open sourcing your product/code, claiming they don't want to use a product they don't control?
18.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
> And be focused. Understand everything in every article, do not accept not understanding everything. I read my first programming books that way. Always ask "Why is that word here" and "Why is that ! there". Made me s
19.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
Every time I hear it contains AI it sounds like the features' outcome will be uncertain. Especially with more experience. If your feature were good you wouldn't have to mention AI to show it is awesome. More than not AI is used as
20.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
Problem is most innovation is in using existing models in new ways. You can't expect these most people to train their own models. Regulating it the way you say just means "zero innovation!".
21.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
The UX is not good enough yet. We would have to 1) show that it is reserved to people going on the link and 2) offer good/enough ways to be notified once the link becomes online and 3) need to know the likelihood of the link to actuall
22.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
Or sync it with Dropbox. Just drop newly-rendered tables into the images folder and bam! you can directly reference them in your latex.
23.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
No wonder Sony goes after Windows people. Half of them soon need a new device.
24.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
LLMs sure. My question is whether it is the same in practice for LLMs behind said API. I found no official documentation that we will get exactly the same result as far as I can tell. And no one here touched how high a multiple the cost is,
25.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
Is there a study or anything that that is guaranteed adding an incomplete assistant: response as the input and the API taking off exactly the same way on the same position?
26.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
How do you know it will have the same state of mind? And how much does that cost.
27.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
The proposed approach used multiple LLM chains. Then you don't know how much context you need. I imagine it can get expensive. Per Commit.
28.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
The open source maintainer gonna pay this?
29.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
How do they know its not that the LLM ingested a couple Alice in Wonderland analyses?
30.
▲
by
DelightOne
2y ago
Do you know what state of the art for storytelling generation is? Searching for my thesis and not sure whether papers reflect the current state of the art.
More ›