Deathcrow

15 ms·

1.
by Deathcrow 2y ago
This is only correct if the sshd backdoor is the only malicious code introduced into the library.
2.
by Deathcrow 2y ago
Is there really a failed login attempts? If it never calls the real functions of ssh in case of their own cert+payload why would sshd log anything or even register a login attempt? Or does the backdoor function hook in after sshd already lo
3.
by Deathcrow 2y ago
Also, in a more optimistic scenario without sockpuppets, it's unlikely that malicious and underhanded contributions will be caught by anyone that isn't a security researcher.
4.
by Deathcrow 2y ago
>A very tight SELinux policy could catch sshd executing something that ain’t a shell but hardening to that degree would be extremely rare I assume. Huh, ssh executes things that aren't shells all the time during normal operation. No
5.
by Deathcrow 3y ago
no one can do what you suggest. it's nonsense.
6.
by Deathcrow 4y ago
companies that abuse on call duty for planned maintenance suck. If it's something predictable or plannable, it's not on call. Hire people to work that day.
7.
by Deathcrow 4y ago
Facebook has probably killed more people with face detection and name tagging in photos alone.
8.
by Deathcrow 4y ago
>Is this real? I'm having trouble believing this shit. Yes it's real and if you think making and distributing homemade hormones to children is vile and dangerous, you're apparently a transphobe nowadays.
9.
by Deathcrow 5y ago
Yup. IMHO spam has become so good at mimicking genuine content, it's hard to recognize even for a human curator. There's so many websites in the top google results that I'm sure are entirely AI generated, which exist for the
10.
by Deathcrow 8y ago
I'm sure those statistics are entirely real and not pulled out of his ass at all. Also didn't Planetary Annihilation have that awful chromium based UI?