DataAF

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by DataAF 7y ago

   Those of us under 30 never knew them either.
2. 2.▲
   by DataAF 7y ago

   >This is the same image they used for their 2018 April Fools prank and faked a domain seizure. The FBI is seizing domains for April Fools Day pranks? Does anyone else think that's an overreach?
3. 3.▲
   by DataAF 7y ago

   Good catch. Mailchimp has better coverage in their TOS than most I've looked at.
4. 4.▲
   by DataAF 7y ago

   True, but then it's on MailChimp to prove it. They're definitely open to arbitration. I wouldn't want to be in that position.
5. 5.▲
   by DataAF 7y ago

   I can't imagine that either, but this isn't a case between Stefan and Mailchimp, this is a case between Stefan and Nandini in Tort Court where the requirements are much lower: 1. The existence of a contractual relationship or bene
6. 6.▲
   by DataAF 7y ago

   Doesn't this open Nandini Jammi up to a Tortious interference lawsuit? Sounds like Stefan and Mailchimp had a business arrangement and she's now a third party interfering with it (and bragging on twitter). https://en.wi
7. 7.▲
   by DataAF 7y ago

   Location: Oakland, Ca Remote: Yes, Please! Willing to Relocate: No Technologies: General ML & Data Science; Python, SciKit Learn, Keras, SQL, MongoDB, Flask; NLP tools like BERT, WordPiece, etc. ; AWS; Enough DevOps to run an ML pipelin