DaSHacka

7 ms·

1.
by DaSHacka 3d ago
So the one orchestrating them would have an even stronger claim to having 'created' something, given its simply a tool?
2.
by DaSHacka 4d ago
I haven't seen people say it's indistinguishable quality, but that it doesn't matter. Quite similar to mass-produced foods in the supermarket, actually. We all know they're not as good as a small batch made by hand by so
3.
by DaSHacka 4d ago
Then do that? At the very least, the presence of more code(/recipes) does not hinder an individual trying to do it themselves.
4.
by DaSHacka 4d ago
You've almost perfectly described Delamain and his side missions from Cyberpunk 2077
5.
by DaSHacka 4d ago
Its the OP's profile picture, edited with a Red Hat fedora.
6.
by DaSHacka 7d ago
Android is getting close, with Google adding desktop support akin to Samsung's Dex when the phone is connected to a dock.
7.
by DaSHacka 8d ago
I only semi-agree with GP; it's trivial for someone who works in Tech to pull it off, but that's really all you need to blow the lid on the whole operation given manufacturers would likely have implemented the same behavior across
8.
by DaSHacka 8d ago
Put a WiFi NIC in monitor mode and see if the TV is connected to another AP based on the 802.11 packets. Or if this theoretical implementation by a manufacturer is using a custom protocol/frequency (very unlikely for a variety of reaso
9.
by DaSHacka 8d ago
How do you think? By broadcasting an open WiFi network and seeing if it connects and requests a DHCP Lease.
10.
by DaSHacka 8d ago
> Don't post generated text or AI-edited text. HN is for conversation between humans. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
11.
by DaSHacka 9d ago
Well yeah, that's kinda the idea, but sometimes it's nice to know what 'the worst' will entail
12.
by DaSHacka 9d ago
At the very least, you can be sure they'll never change the terms of the agreement to be more beneficial for you, though. So just treat it as a best case scenario, knowing that it can get even worse.
13.
by DaSHacka 9d ago
LOL it never ceases to amaze me what people on fringe sides of the internet get worked up over. Actual modern day luddites, it's going to be so hilarious in a couple years from now when they all stop caring about AI and move on to the
14.
by DaSHacka 9d ago
They also don't arbitrarily nuke entire domains (with legal content) from the archive like archive.org does.
15.
by DaSHacka 9d ago
"innocent" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that statement. Does it change the calculus at all if this "innocent" person was trying to dox the operator for nothing more than satisfying a personal whim?
16.
by DaSHacka 9d ago
Maybe in the eyes of some, but the archive is still up and the operator is not dead to two shots to the back of the head.
17.
by DaSHacka 9d ago
Because if he's being targeted by the feds, he obviously he doesn't want his private information being published by some guy who self-admittedly did it on a whim? Is this really that hard to understand?
18.
by DaSHacka 9d ago
You realize the CIA is nonpartisan, right?
19.
by DaSHacka 11d ago
More like the business tax
20.
by DaSHacka 12d ago
Why would you assume Google, Apple, and defense-oriented agencies like CISA wouldn't also have access to those same models, but using them to fix issues? Its just raising the bar across the board, I don't see how only attackers wo
21.
by DaSHacka 12d ago
Honestly, even as a Linux guy who doesn't use Windows (almost) at all anymore, I trust Microsoft to be generic and corporate in their spying. They'll spy on users usage habits, and likely backdoor their OS for the feds, but they w
22.
by DaSHacka 13d ago
Surprisingly, I've had really good luck with reverse engineering on frontier models (without being part of CVP or similar). It's more the exploit development/PoC that it locks up on, which, as I use `pi`, I just switch the mo
23.
by DaSHacka 13d ago
More like annoying, as some of us will no doubt run into this self-lobotomization at some point and wonder why a GPT-6 model is behaving like GPT-2 all of a sudden
24.
by DaSHacka 13d ago
Well, the post in OP is a good start
25.
by DaSHacka 15d ago
I'll sleep so much better at night when the company that'll leak my Social Security Number on the internet due to hosting a backup of a database that's assessible publicly gets fined $0.30 per SSN leaked. Hell, the execs may
26.
by DaSHacka 15d ago
> So a job has to pay decently more than that or else nobody will do it. Yeah, though the problem in the U.S. is we have a constant influx of workers perfectly happy to serve as scabs, and no mainstream political party is willing to addr
27.
by DaSHacka 15d ago
Because the incentive has been changed from the true best output always, to a mix of "close to the best but not always" output. For the (majority) of us using Claude models for computing as a tool, obviously we're not going t
28.
by DaSHacka 15d ago
I actually think there's already a lot of us in the 'community' as-is. I personally describe it as 'Valuing Privacy/Freedom over Security'. One pretty clear example of this is how they don't recommend usin
29.
by DaSHacka 15d ago
Although the nice thing about Aurora Store is it allows you to install apps without a google account linked to your device, keeping Google Play Services signed-out. Somewhere in the FAQ GOS advertises that Play Services can be used without
30.
by DaSHacka 16d ago
Only Anthropic does that AFAIK, at least I can use my $20/month Codex and Kimi subscriptions in pi.

More ›