DKnoll3

5 ms·

1.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Because...uh...NATO.
2.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Well, glad you asked. The part that goes wrong is that you don't have to view a Privacy Policy behind a tiny poorly colored hyperlink before clicking "I Agree".
3.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Decreasing attack vectors means supporting less solutions and organizations that do this shit, not more of them.
4.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Not fully, but they're still very much involved. Money talks, and they're invested.
5.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
I was always under the impression that the reason you couldn't undo was purely to encourage putting thought into your votes, instead of clicking after the first sentence, getting through the rest of the post, and looking to take your u
6.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned anything about Niantic being an "independent" spinoff from Google/Alphabet. Interesting to think about what personal information they're gaining from this, as well as mapping
7.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Because the FSB will always have a backup. Rehashed NSA joke, likely very correct.
8.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
That's quite a presumption you have there.
9.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
They do also have a vested interest in bringing internet to developed regions in a way - where else are you supposed to get the low-cost H1B labour?
10.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
And you think this will make people safer?
11.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
What does that even mean? Replace anonymous crypto-currencies with cash, and realize how ridiculous you sound.
12.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Yeah, tell that to the guy who wrote "ISIS beer fund" on his PayPal transfer to his mate that we have an "independent judicial system". No - we have an outsourced judicial system, where Facebook and Google will spy on yo
13.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Yes, clever as a fox for running a wildly insecure server that foreign nations could spy on her from, in order to dodge FOIA.
14.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Because being able to call someone a terrorist (or a hacker, in 5-10 years time) as a reason to turn off their credit card when it's the only method of payment left will be a dystopian nightmare.
15.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Some people DO want that. Or, at least, the consent is manufactured. You know - for your safety.
16.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
I hope you never have to experience a loss because of carelessness.
17.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Enough to say "Yeah, but everyone else did it, and it wasn't that many, so..." ...and here we are.
18.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Glad you asked! http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/15/politics/45-times-secretary-cl... From one of her biggest supporters, no less!
19.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
These were the best I could find in the short time I had. https://pyra-handheld.com/boards/threads/how-to-send-receive... http://www.smssolutions.net/tutorials/gsm/receivesmsat/
20.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
https://pyra-handheld.com/boards/pages/pyra/
21.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
This is better, no? https://pyra-handheld.com/boards/pages/pyra/
22.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
What do you think of this? https://pyra-handheld.com/boards/pages/pyra/
23.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
As someone very excited about this space, I unfortunately have to agree that Tesla is playing fast and loose with autonomous safety (and more importantly, public opinion!) to be first to market. You can't be half in and half out, which
24.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Exactly. Oh, you can keep using your old device, you just can't have the latest version of iOS. Oh, you want apps on your old device? Just install the "___" version of iOS! Thanks for nothing!
25.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
I'd love to hear more about his misunderstanding, please continue.
26.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Perhaps it's because it reeks of limited hangout (trusted insider reveals a bunch of info, and then everyone uses his brief software mentions to convince everyone what tools to use), even if he isn't actually one? Vice has me very
27.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Good luck trying to hit "Reply-All" when the email is sent correctly (all recipients are BCC for their own privacy).
28.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
Actually, that's a great example, glad you brought it up. That's not less secure, and very similar to this situation. That technology is being hailed as "more secure" because it requires you to insert, and type your secr
29.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
If that's the only indication you're using for this, I think you'll be very disappointed.
30.
by DKnoll3 10y ago
So does using an OS that respects the user's right to choose, and doesn't rely on trickery to change users to a more commercially friendly platform.

More ›