Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
CriticalCathed
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
Treasonous.
2.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
So do a lot of things our government does. I am glad that my monthly donation to the EFF at the very least is being used to push back.
3.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
This is beyond a spurious claim.
4.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
Um. He doesn't advocate do nothing. He specifically says the opposite. Read the paper. WTF?
5.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
>I am worried there is a fine line between 'realism' and a backlash against care for the elderly and chronically ill. I guarantee you that if we don't target our lockdowns on the at-risk population (elderly being the most
6.
▲
Fighting Covid-19: the heterogeneous transmission thesis
(math.cmu.edu)
1 points
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
>Hydroxycholorquine is interesting [1] both as an anti-inflammatory and immune modulator. The Azithromycin probably does nothing against nCoV-2 but may well help control secondary infection. I had no clarity as to why azithromycin had im
8.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
You're putting words into my mouth. And I really don't appreciate it. In fact, I think that our focus should be directly on the at risk population. I think we should do more to protect them and provide a whole host of interventi
9.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
>We don't usually call a disease that can easily evolve to pneumonie "a cold". That's not true. Just not true. Colds and influenza regularly proceed to pnemonia or long lasting secondary lower respiratory infections,
10.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
So they claim. Anything out of China should be taken with a healthy pinch of skepticism.
11.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
>We don't halt the world for "bad colds". No we typically don't. But in this case we may have . The science is beginning to point to the fact that this virus is not particularly lethal, but it is extremely contagious
12.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
That's too bad. We really need to ramp up PCR tests as well as begin serological studies (there is one I am ware of, and a product on the way.) Immediately. We will not get this under control if we don't. We need to know how fast
13.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
To be clear, the evidence seems to be that your outcome is still in the minority of cases. Some unknown but double digit percentage experience no symptoms at all despite testing positive, another large proportion only experience upper respi
14.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
I had read that rebuttal. The odd thing about it is as the author himself wrote, I'm not sure that Ioannidis is advocating inaction. Neither would I. Things must be done. It's that it's completely unclear that the "lockd
15.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
Absolutely. One of the worst consequences that we may have to deal with at the end of this is that public trust will go down. In the beginning our leaders failed to act on the guidance of the scientific and medical communities -- almost two
16.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
You are spreading misinformation yourself. Even your own link doesn't support exactly what you just said. "Renaming" is not what happened. Your link: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/mar&#x
17.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
This is so completely blowing this crisis out of proportion. I am so confused by the tenor of the discourse on HN. I expected more from this place.
18.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
It's not all that confusing. The science is pretty clear. The best use of masks on people in public is on the sick themselves. You can't use the standards and practices in something like a TB hospital for medical personnel in p
19.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
Which part? I'm happy to oblige for specifics, but it's all available on the Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_flu_pandemic
20.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
Is this a serum or antibody test? If so, this is very good news. If mass testing occurs we will know very soon the true nature of the disease. For example, after serum testing for H1N1 we learned -- to our horror -- that 1.4 billion people
21.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
6y ago
Is it? It's a letter intended to persuade President Donald Trump to act in relief of California. I think the statistic is not out of context. There's nothing in that letter that changes the meaning. We have outside knowledge with
22.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
7y ago
Which also has a sunset clause that will never ever be allowed to expire. All this talk of temporary authority is a joke.
23.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
7y ago
It has been refreshing to see the mask come off of those feigning care about "undesirables" who would be disproportionately affected by this virus. At the end of the day we come down to economic calculations to decide whether to l
24.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
7y ago
>science discredited and ignored There is a large faction of people in the USA who believe this a politically motivated hoax. This is the world we are living in. How can we vote in competent leaders when a large faction holds such strong
25.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
7y ago
As interesting as this is I'm not sure that this attention is beneficial for the man who is clearly mentally ill. Should this be on HN? Quote from his repo: >This is not a part of a game. All of my family and friends' voices we
26.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
7y ago
One could argue that its merely lost to another government faction. Ala intra-aristocratic strife.
27.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
7y ago
The ID.3 looks like a hot hatchback. What's the problem?
28.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
7y ago
I imagine in case of the safety of the habitation there probably would be exceptions made. You know, an emergency or crisis of some kind. An act of god. I would imagine that if this went to court and the laws had a carve-out for that... Any
29.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
7y ago
I can understand critiquing Tesla's business models, their claims about the cars, their financial status, or even Musk's character. But calling what Tesla has done over the last 10 years unimpressive makes no sense to me.
30.
▲
by
CriticalCathed
7y ago
I disagree. Spectre vulnerabilities are not new. They didn't make a factual error in their reply.
More ›