CompanionCuuube

6 ms·

1.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
I guess you can agree with a meta-satire of your comment.
2.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
woosh
3.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
> he never made even a token effort at gun control. That's not actually true, there are incidents like the ammo import ban to automatically prohibiting elderly people receiving financial assistance. The fact that the gun control you
4.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
Leave the crowd.
5.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
You picked a terrible example, as he did restrict guns on a number of occasions during the terms. The fact that the gun control lobby gave him an "F" rating is because the fact that they want too much and are never happy with just
6.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
It certainly didn't make Democrats reconsider taking the rights of millions of Americans away after they lost the midterms following the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban.
7.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
Yeah, coast supremacy is getting really tiresome.
8.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
Not really: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24969112
9.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
Why is it acceptable when police walk around with a handgun, but "disturbing the peace" when normal people do the same thing? Why is it acceptable when police stop people for breaking traffic laws, but "false imprisonment&quo
10.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
The state divides aren't nearly as significant as the urban/rural divides. Practically every state red or blue has blue cities and red rural areas.
11.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
>Considering all the other rights in the bill of rights are individual, there does seem to be some consistency to that. But it could be argued that we would be a safer country if all of the rights in the bill of rights were collective ra
12.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
So would this university take down a mural of the 442nd Infantry Regiment too, for not being diverse enough? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/442nd_Infantry_Regiment_(Unite... "The unit earned more than 18,000 awards
13.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
> both for ethical and commercial reasons But primarily commercial reasons related to having a completely different distribution model.
14.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
> So maybe do something less violent, like kneel during a football game. People will definitely unilaterally support that, right? Yeah, get one of those famous players like Roger Federer. Or maybe the whole Detroit Redskins team.
15.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
That's a very interesting perspective that would explain a lot of behavior.
16.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
> Elections still happened during the U.S. Civil War and both World Wars. Did they close down schools for that? Did they hold elections during the 1918 Pandemic? Let's have an honest comparison here.
17.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
It'll take more tries, but eventually the fourth one will stay up.
18.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
You need to think about it a little more. In the story, the admiral is conceited about his position so much so that he believes that he has the right not to understand the situation. Which is exactly why the commenter is in the stated posit
19.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
Well, they are throwing unspecified bottles of liquid at them, so they're not peaceful protesters either.
20.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
“This is a lighthouse. Your call.”
21.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
So you would be okay with a term like "avant-garde"?
22.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
“This is a lighthouse. Your call.”
23.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
> Also, one loud rioter was calling out individual officers promising them that they would find out where they live and kill them and their families. And then people are surprised at the news articles about officers covering up their bad
24.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
Which use of the LVNR caused "1 month of protest and billions of dollars lost"?
25.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
Telling of what? That they reuse a term?
26.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
> I was making the point and deleted it because of the kind of misrepresentation that you just made. Convenient, rather than modify it to clarify the vagueness you instead deleted it. Now no one can see for themselves what the evidence w
27.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
As was mentioned in another comment, memexy is in Phase 1 - mischaracterize
28.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
Not to all people, and not necessarily to the commenter you are responding to.
29.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
> So then you weren't asking the question in good faith. Yes, I was. > When I asked you to clarify you dodged the question. I wouldn't ask if I knew, I asked because I didn't know what you were referring to. If you didn
30.
by CompanionCuuube 6y ago
You apparently know which one it was, and can look up the response. It isn't a very long response either. I'm not going to quote it here, because it gives you a chance to talk about it at me rather than with the original person wh

More ›