Cobord

7 ms·

1.
by Cobord 4y ago
{}
2.
by Cobord 4y ago
But you should not be writing functions that make you think about the fact that Hask is not really a category.
3.
by Cobord 4y ago
Anyone could build such applications that they might hope become the biggest in the world, but there is still a conglomeration effect. You have centralization, but anyone can become the center. This is displayed by your "biggest in the
4.
by Cobord 4y ago
The Italian school was foundational in this subject, so you might enjoy reading the basic material as they originally wrote it. Just be wary that it's old so the mistakes there have since been fixed.
5.
by Cobord 6y ago
https://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/st...
6.
by Cobord 7y ago
Overqualified
7.
by Cobord 7y ago
Comprehending orders of magnitude is the problem of humans not groking exponentials.
8.
by Cobord 7y ago
Do a simple lower bound calculation, and you see that Elon is talking out of his ass.
9.
by Cobord 7y ago
Or he doesn't care about burnout. Because of the branding of how cool space is, and robotic missions that actually advance the science not being as sexy, he has a fresh supply of excited people (rant about the science vs the sensation)
10.
by Cobord 7y ago
Yes. I do want the per capita and total GDP to be lower if that means raising the minimum of the distribution and reducing its variance.
11.
by Cobord 7y ago
But we need the counterfactual. When the labor they "optimized" would have done the same or better without their interference, we cannot tell. We just take the estimates from the manager themselves as the baseline. And of course,
12.
by Cobord 7y ago
That is because it was proposed with cuts to everything else. That leaves people to fall through the cracks in the meantime. If you transition to UBI without those issues, progressives like the idea.
13.
by Cobord 7y ago
By how much absolutely does rent go up vs how much the wage has risen? Are the people better off or not? Don't just say rising rents as a catch all. This is all the more case for UBI vs rising minimum wage because in UBI there aren&#x2
14.
by Cobord 7y ago
Almost 2 decades before
15.
by Cobord 7y ago
I missed seeing the individual option. Thanks for that. See you around.
16.
by Cobord 8y ago
Meanwhile as a mathematical physicist, I learned about her through instantons. Quite a wide career.
17.
by Cobord 8y ago
I tried my hand at editing it, but was definitely lost at the question that it's not that hard to understand geometrically what the idea is, but how it relates to physics means doing a lot more work. So hard to strike the balance. Why
18.
by Cobord 8y ago
I think OP is saying they don't know anything about anything. Which has a point, they claim to know what they are doing, but just have such large capital that there is no way for them to fail even if they did everything wrong. So you c
19.
by Cobord 8y ago
But otherwise it is a just show up event? Also if it is too late to give a talk, could one do a poster etc?
20.
by Cobord 8y ago
But it says call for participation ended 2 weeks ago. Are you going to have something else available?
21.
by Cobord 8y ago
https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00738 is really nice for general context. Plus can implement some of these generalizations from what is already here.
22.
by Cobord 8y ago
There is also the Zariski topology of Spec Z that is the topology of numbers in the sense of algebraic geometry. Or of Z[x]
23.
by Cobord 8y ago
That also invokes negative connotations of analog computing that occur because of it's problems in the old days. On another note: There is also a sense of analog quantum computing when you use bosonic modes instead of qubits.
24.
by Cobord 8y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorial_species
25.
by Cobord 8y ago
Shameless Plug: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08865
26.
by Cobord 8y ago
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1711/1711.04235.pdf
27.
by Cobord 8y ago
But I would think the same applies to your algorithms teacher. There should be just as many good and bad ones there. Yet it seems different level of what is counted as too rote and unusable.
28.
by Cobord 8y ago
Consider symplectic integrators. You would never come up with them or realize the problem of energy drift if you hadn't first paid attention to the fundamentals of the geometry and calculus underlying the problem. This is just my favor
29.
by Cobord 8y ago
That is only if your allowing yourself to take the numerical methods as a black box. If you want to be sure that your method is okay, you prove error bounds as you take limits of 0 mesh size. Otherwise it is just building tables of black ma
30.
by Cobord 8y ago
Or you learn how to make the toy problem that has the same behavior as what you are trying to model. If you don't understand how to simplify problems, you end up just chucking the computation at it and calling it a day. If you have a s

More ›