ChrisKor

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ChrisKor 7y ago

   Let's hope this gets other manufacturers to also release some 16" laptops.
2. 2.▲
   by ChrisKor 7y ago

   I am actually not sure I would call Kialo debates, debates, they seem to me more like argument maps, coupled with Wikipedia. Also, they aren't antagonistic and there isn't really a winner. I have gotten plenty of claims rejected b
3. 3.▲
   by ChrisKor 7y ago

   On Kialo the sources in the arguments are normally discussed in pros and cons underneath the argument they are in, or in the comments of a claim, sort of a meta discussion where folks discuss how to best formulate a claim. Some of their arg
4. 4.▲
   by ChrisKor 7y ago

   Very much agree, let's not forget that this kind of thinking is most likely the reason Steve Jobs is not anymore among us. Rational reasoning does certainly not always lead to the best outcome, but on average, it does. > What else t
5. 5.▲
   by ChrisKor 7y ago

   I have heard that Twitter is working on something like this. The hard part of course being the detection of what is an argument and what is commentary or anecdote sharing. >As an aside, I wonder how good grammar checkers have become sinc
6. 6.▲
   by ChrisKor 7y ago

   > Argument mapping is not just about pro/con trees; but pro/con trees are a nearly-lossless way to capture how people actually debate things, so they’re a good “ingested primary source” format to keep around and refer back to w
7. 7.▲
   by ChrisKor 7y ago

   They actually do have linking[0] and map creators are usually quite anal about only having one instance of each argument in a map. So instead of accepting your suggestion they will just link the already present one there, which can be a bit
8. 8.▲
   by ChrisKor 7y ago

   I wish Kialo [0] would allow you to export their giant argument maps in this sort of markdown, instead of their crappy outline format. [0] http://www.kialo.com/