CelticSuperhero

5 ms·

1.
by CelticSuperhero 10y ago
What do you expect from a non native UI which is rendered by the Chromium extensions system? It only can be as fast as the used System is. So, Vivaldi is nothing at all for people who value speed more than functions. But for people who valu
2.
by CelticSuperhero 10y ago
Vivaldi features are not that bad, but the fact that this "browser" is only a combination of some extensions bundled with Chromium is a big downside. Also, not being able to implement more privacy for example fingerprint block is
3.
by CelticSuperhero 10y ago
The thing is Mozilla is all about Chrome technology, Chrome parity and Chrome design. Everything they care about is Google and Chrome. I miss the times where Mozilla was able to think on their own and was no follower and admirer of a danger
4.
Opera will be sold for real now
3 points by CelticSuperhero 10y ago|0 comments
5.
by CelticSuperhero 10y ago
Vivaldi has amazing features, yes. But it is no real browser and only an advanced web app bundled with Chromium. Also, smashing a wrapper on top of Chromium with features and call it a day is one of the most stupid things ever which a group
6.
by CelticSuperhero 10y ago
That is the point. Is it so surprising that power users are the most vocal one's and do complain if one of their pet features is going to be axed? (And many of our pet features have disappeared since that Chrome UI annoyance called Aus
7.
by CelticSuperhero 10y ago
So you finally step back from cloning the Chrome UI and add customization again to the browser? Oh wait, you are implementing the Chrome extension system. That test pilot is only damage control as you are now not only facing Chrome, also fr
8.
by CelticSuperhero 10y ago
https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=11810&start=... - for everyone who is interested in finding out if the attack was just a cry for attention or backed up with facts.
9.
by CelticSuperhero 10y ago
Well respected? In earlier times for sure. But Mozilla of today has totally left power users alone. I would not call that what is left a genuinely good company
10.
by CelticSuperhero 10y ago
Pale Moon team got as it seems some request from Mozilla to silence the Pale Moon forums Mozilla critics.
11.
by CelticSuperhero 11y ago
So, they have issues already with implementing Promises and handle the older less complicated technology wise seen engine 24 - and they are seriously thinking about forking a much later code base and try to keep their old ui, remove Austral
12.
by CelticSuperhero 11y ago
http://logs.glob.uno/?c=mozilla%23seamonkey&s=2+Mar+2016&e=2... - Also very nice read, Mozilla guys bashing people from Pale Moon project. What for idiots.
13.
by CelticSuperhero 11y ago
Not sure if this is true, but if this post is not fake, i would say Mozilla have lost the benefit of trust. Seeing what they have done in the last few years, makes this post look less like a fake.