CaptWorld

37 ms·

1.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
It's just because of this administration but future admins can revert it back and even then, i would expect the fund receivers themselves will eventually use AI so.
2.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Sure. But experts seem to be aware of the direction of those solutions so it seems unlikely there could be some hidden bug which disproves it. But it could be possible.
3.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Of course, there's a possibility but it exists everywhere but there's no sign till now that it has. Same with openai's proofs.
4.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
A) that's a bad model to think. You are of the mind that working more hours is the only way to measure gdp whereas increase in productivity with tools like AI, machinery, tech etc can act as a multiplier. So this way you are conflating
5.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Why can't it both? Of course they are not gonna do it just because it improves the world and understanding but because there's an incentive to align money with progress. Even the vaccines initially were distributed to get monetary
6.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
But US also spends too much on education as well. The issue doesn't seem to be funding but the educational reform like in mississippi, where they increased student performance without increasing their budget too much. That's why y
7.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Which metrics are poisoned? Can you provide your arguments for why Good heart's law applies here and how and which metrics are bad measures? For b, can the writer at least provide their own thoughts or are they gonna leave it as exerci
8.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Got it. Thanks. I feel people are using this single story to downplay this feat. There's definitely a chance but I don't see any indication of similar bugs in here or the openai's proofs that were created a month ago as i thi
9.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
So I think curing means basically opt in death or something like that. Right now extended life is bad because the person isn't in his prime but curing aging is basically gonna keep him in his prime. This might be what they meant.
10.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Like? I feel breakthroughs that can be found via AI might help us more in the long term where even previously non AI fields can be helped by AI. So you have specific non AI research in mind that we're underinvesting in? Because the USA
11.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Do you have proof of this bug or something? Is this just envy against computers now ?
12.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Can't you see the pathway where the individuals who are experts in their fields utilise AI to make breakthroughs like these mathematicians finding breakthroughs in mere 4-5 years since the advent of LLMs. In other areas, The bottleneck
13.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
So oppressed that they are one of the main reasons for positive gdp growth in the USA, tax revenues, mathematical/scientific innovations etc. They're doing all this but still can't imagine a positive vision for the world but
14.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
You talk as though they are making it to intentionally commit felony or not taking measures to reduce harm etc.
15.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Why? Even communists weren't this doomed and were actively rooting for it to solve the economic calculation problem which ai might take us to. People are just pessimistic in general ig
16.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Childhood deaths and fatal diseases are also natural parts but that doesn't make them desirable to everyday humans. But with new advances, people might have the ability to CHOOSE in future.
17.
by CaptWorld 12d ago
Regardless the profit margin as a talking point seems to be bad as AI as a tech might never be reversed whether anthropic failed or succeeded. Indeed it's imperative we subsidize AI companies and tech to make them explore more solution
18.
by CaptWorld 1mo ago
I think you inverted the causation, the provider doesn't nudge but their culture is more oriented being healthy which in turn makes providers provide the services for that. The people of the USA are generally centre right and they say
19.
by CaptWorld 1mo ago
I think you have to account for multiple factors like Americans are generally unhealthy people, the people have better access to the top of the line medical technology, people actually spend and consume more compared to the EU. This blog po
20.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
Thank you.. this was what I meant.
21.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
Lol.. why do people ask employees this stuff as though they're the ones controlling big decisions?
22.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
What a disingenuous question. Par for the course for the likes of you. Just because I view the west as less evil than the east doesn't mean we like to get colonised. These are my views: 1. We would not like to get colonised. 2. But hi
23.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
How do you not know about the policies like prioritising calcutta and ignore other regions of Bengal, surrounding states restrictions to supply food to bengal, price controls, local shortages + 1942 cyclone + british prioritizing their own
24.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
For the love of God, you guys are brain broken.. there's a limited resource and churchill didn't want to provide to India because of that and add that there's some major corruption in Bengal at that time that caused it.. you
25.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
As tho they weren't shitholes before the intervention and those are the only examples when they themselves treat their citizens like trash by oppressing themselves and they got bombed because they're bored? Lol Idk if this is a pa
26.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
Sorry ignore the other reply.. i thought I lost my comment.. > Yes Beyond parody .. as expected of Marxist thinking..
27.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
Then you mean they are equal right? Which is also blatantly false. Capitalism and liberalism alone would compensate for many of the drawbacks caused by western atrocities. You talk as though colonisation, slavery, imperialism was only done
28.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
Western countries have good internal competition that the atrocities they commit can be stopped by themselves whereas middle eastern/eastern ones needed external support for reformation famously hiroshima, deng reforms, soviet dissolut
29.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
Not so much better but better in general compared to the middle eastern/eastern colonialism.. westerners have good competiton that the atrocities will be self corrected by itself but middle eastern/eastern colonies needed external
30.
by CaptWorld 2mo ago
I understand China but in no way were japan and Russia close to western. IJA, MAO and soviet union makes westerners look like chuds. Russians still have the wagner group shit which is nowhere near what western countries have currently.

More ›