CakeEngine

4 ms·

1.
by CakeEngine 5mo ago
Maybe they've just not thought about that (yet). It looks to be mostly coded by Claude so, presumably, it been a very quick project to take from zero to where it is now, and they're in the mode of throwing old socks at the wall.
2.
by CakeEngine 1y ago
Also in the 80s we (by which I mean other people), downloaded software from the television by sticking an LDR to the screen whilst a dot flashed black and white during the duration of a programme. A program from a programme. I remember see
3.
by CakeEngine 2y ago
Is this not something that can be addressed with cameras and (maybe) learnt approaches now? You don't need blind repeatability if you've got good visual monitoring to close the control loop, you just (just!) need good accuracy and
4.
by CakeEngine 3y ago
Another early 90s C learner here, and I also put (and still do!) parentheses around return expressions. But I do: `return( 1 );` not `return (1);` ...because the bracket belongs to the return, not the expression. It's b
5.
by CakeEngine 4y ago
Indeed. There's also UZI - a v7 UNIX for Z80.
6.
by CakeEngine 4y ago
I don't think it would be. You'd have to detect them on the data bus and also differentiate between data and instruction accesses which I don't /think/ the Z80 does, at least not easily.
7.
by CakeEngine 4y ago
This is only a problem is there's a clear mapping from detectable genetic feature to an expressed macro-feature like intelligence. My (admittedly limited) understanding is that each detectable genetic feature has a whole panoply of eff
8.
by CakeEngine 4y ago
Folk are getting hung up on the keyboard layout and poor buttons, which are bad but only the start of the problems with these machines. It has two separate asynchronous screens, two sets of printed instructions (plus t&cs), more instruc