CaffeineLD50

5 ms·

1.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
I am unaware of any such warning nor do I know what a flamewar style is. Ban away. I don't need you.
2.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
Indeed
3.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
I use signal. Don't need.
4.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
Murena has a preloaded fork. Easy
5.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
I'm pretty sure my degoogled Murena /e/ OS pixel 5 won't have this problem.
6.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
I'm pretty sure my degoogled Murena /e/ OS pixel 5 won't have this problem.
7.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
[flagged]
8.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
We still have witch hunts both figuratively and literally - we assign blame to innocent parties and jail or unelect them. And awareness is irrelevant. When I listened to the golden age of punk rock (IMHO) I didn't need to be aware of i
9.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
I fucking approve!
10.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
The use of passive voice and vagueness hides the actors involved: namely management. But they always have a spreadsheet where they calculate how they can convert your former salary into their bonus. "Never underestimate (management) gr
11.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
I beg to differ
12.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
Dozens of news articles report remote workers are quitting instead of RTO and or would quit if forced to do so. The "practical merits" of unionizing don't matter if you're gonna quit anyway: go for it. It'll probabl
13.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
It doesn't matter- they failed to punish the US, stop supporting Israel, or withdraw from the middle east or whatever their goals were. Terrorism fails but I never said it was "without effect". Vegans boycotting milk hasn&#x2
14.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
The Unabomber wanted to end "technological society " but he did manage to improve postal safety standards. Mission accomplished? If the goal of the 9/11 hijackers was to improve airport security then mission accomplished!
15.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
Absolutely correct !! If voting is not coordinated and done in an effective manner its just a 3rd party protest vote "gesture" (in the US w a 2party system )
16.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
/_\ /_\/_\ Triforcin'
17.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
Once they starting working federal contracts their fate was sealed Trump has promised to pull hard on the leash of federal dollars. If Google want "freedom" it will be free of those federal dollars. I suspect they don't want
18.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
People who work at Google may have an influence on that more than those who don't And are likely to be more motivated anyway as they have skin in the game Once you quit its not as compelling a problem
19.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
If there are 10 remote labor contractors waiting for every quitter (equivalent to a strike breaker "scab") how is google hurt at all? There are many kinds of " strike" and they require planning and thought. Here's
20.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
DEI as such like racial quotas generally have failed, for what reasons we can guess. You can protest by quitting but that won't fix anything Its like vegans "quitting" meat. Not a cow was ever saved by this gesture. There are
21.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
You are correct down to the last point. That's not what this poll is about. Would you do it doesn't need to think about all the possible ways it can fail. Would you drive a car can be analyzed as a self financing life threatening
22.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
Unions can be quite useless. No strike clauses can make them basically a paid extension of management. I'm not suggesting that this would be an existing union. It might be a wholly new single issue union. But I hear ya. I've been
23.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
Fair enough. I find it to be lonely and without adaptive management it can be alienating from your peers. I'm more of a hybrid flexible few days of WFH kinda guy myself
24.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
No. The other reasons have failed. Those other reasons will only muddy the waters. Its WFH or go home... Once unionized everything is on the table but without a union it's just words.
25.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
It's a game changer no doubt but unionizing is powerful AND risky. The benefit must be compelling enough and/or the would be unionizers have to be risk tolerant (i.e. willing to be illegally fired ).
26.
Ask HN: Would You Unionize for WFH?
8 points by CaffeineLD50 1y ago|18 comments
27.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
A nice write up. But our AI overlords will need metrics that they can use.
28.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
Ill check it out. I agree "LinkedIn sucks". What is your stance on privacy?
29.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
And the misbehaved bots follow the path right into the pit and then...the Void of Infinite AI Abyss.
30.
by CaffeineLD50 1y ago
I guess Zuck's new found interest in manly combat sports is based on his expectation of seeing PDiddy, SBF, and Luigi in club fed over his l33+ pir8cy. It all makes sense now. #freezuck

More ›