Brighthurst

5 ms·

1.
by Brighthurst 3y ago
From a theoretical standpoint, this answer could get very long, but the real answer boils down to the creator of the protocol prefers bitcoin. On the theoretical side, I'd argue that bitcoin PoW is the best choice because it is more re
2.
by Brighthurst 3y ago
I'd like to point out that the apparent "crypto dominance" is mostly due to that group's propensity to be early-adopters of new technology. The apparent crypto spam is actually a good opportunity to squash the bot issue
3.
by Brighthurst 3y ago
Wow, this is super cool. As a hobbyist game dev, I really hope to see bevy support soonish, as it has a dedicated community and is also Rust-based. Or rather, a rust crate for whatever rust-based engine wants to use it. Rust-based game engi
4.
by Brighthurst 3y ago
As a pedantic native speaker, I'd like to describe the different interpretations I have for these words. Hopefully this explanation illustrates the differences in a more useful way to you than simple ordering. I am not saying that this
5.
by Brighthurst 3y ago
That's a good point and it illustrates what the solution is too. Email, is a series of protocols: POP3, SMTP and IMAP; thus they don't suffer issues with HTTP (a different protocol) that this article describes. The Web mail apps a
6.
by Brighthurst 3y ago
Yeah, I think nostr is the obvious solution when you realize this article is all about the issues of federating/decentralizing on top of HTTP. The P in HTTP is protocol. So the solution is that we need a different protocol: nostr
7.
by Brighthurst 3y ago
Yeah, as far as I can tell, nostr does indeed solve the issues discussed ITT. I think it stems from the fact that nostr is a protocol, just like HTTP. So instead of federating or decentralizing on top of http, we needed a different protocol