Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
BrightGlow
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
1.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
I don't think the regular user even knows what WebGL and WASM are, they will just wonder why their browser game isn't working and then google the cryptic setting that they have to change to get it to work.
2.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
No. I don't want to continue this discussion based on this line of questioning, sorry. Let's be good people and not fight, I'm sure you're a kind soul.
3.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
>there is nothing wrong with doing such, there is zero track to you that someone somewhere on this planet is tinkering with an operating system you do not agree with the design decisions of. I don't understand why you're saying
4.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
>but the integrity questions still remain. For those previous elections? No, they don't. The elections themselves are settled. You are asking questions about something different which is future elections, that's an entirely dif
5.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
Please avoid making this argument, it's a false equivalence. Youtube is not self-censoring those things. If you want me to ask a similarly misleading line of questioning based only on trying to draw false equivalence from principles: C
6.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
I've read about plenty of this, all of that is completely normal. Every election people will try to game the system. It happens. We deal with it on a case-by-case basis. Sometimes we do a better job than other times. It's not fund
7.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
I don't see how I am missing the point. Everything you've said would be mostly within the guidelines. Where you would get into trouble is if you did start saying "Nixon really won" or otherwise trying to say the election
8.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
>It's like a blueprint for what to review further. Why? Something going viral on social media is not proof or evidence that it happened or not. And as you know, without these policies anyone can spread false information about any el
9.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
>You could strip out systemd and put in a custom init system that doesn't conform to the typical Unix daemon startup expectations. I actually don't think you can do this, or would even want to. Systemd doesn't really do an
10.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
You spent a lot of time explaining this and I agree with everything you said. But that's a really long-winded technologist's way of putting it. I'd personally phrase in a simpler way: music is useless and has no value. It ser
11.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
I tried really hard to like SerenityOS but I think the decision to make it a UNIX-like POSIX system is a mistake. The POSIX API is outdated and broken in a lot of ways. I wish people would stop making UNIX-like operating systems, we have en
12.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
With a reputation system you'd still want to do your due diligence and manually check things. Even the most trustworthy people make honest mistakes sometimes.
13.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
Blind people can also get malware...
14.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
Not sure about other browsers but this is incorrect for Chrome and Firefox. They both have flags to disable WebGL and WASM. Please be careful not to spread misinformation, we owe it to ourselves to research our posts well.
15.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
You may want to try this project: https://github.com/i-rinat/apulse But I don't recommend using only ALSA without a sound server on a desktop, the usability of it is pretty bad.
16.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
Well I don't usually need to connect audio from Firefox directly into a DAW or synthesizer. And technically that could still be done with Jack, it's just a bit harder to do because you have to create additional pulseaudio sinks fi
17.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
Sure, but that's one distro.
18.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
Sorry, I don't mean the article is trolling or bad-faith. What I mean is that the author seems to have been trolled and the article is only responding to that trolling. That's just my guess after seeing this 4chan wiki and after s
19.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
I'm not a GNOME developer and I have no idea what you mean by self-righteous. I don't particularly care what the "right" way to do things is, I can only notice areas where there are problems and then give suggestions. An
20.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
I don't know about alsa, I don't remember what happened when I tried that years ago. Yeah Unix permissions is bad, Pipewire is definitely better there. The security is a big improvement but I also wouldn't say that's any
21.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
I think they break third party apps because it's a real pain to keep maintaining a bunch of incompatible old versions of an API forever. Also your last paragraph doesn't follow to me because the whole reason these apps exist is be
22.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
>Really? You think programs can't just load all of the libraries in a given directory? They can't, a library implements a specific API. >except they still boil down to the exact same interface. "Button X was pressed...
23.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
I can't agree, ever since jack2 I actually never had any problem getting it to work with pulse. You may be thinking of jack1. Pipewire does make it easier to do this though.
24.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
In my opinion, that article is pretty insubstantial and is mostly just responding to the same 4chan trolling mentioned in this wiki. It's just not a productive line of discussion and doesn't make any sense in the actual context of
25.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
>Your assumption that everyone cares about this is false, there's no "misconceptions" here. The only misconception is the one that GNOME is the center of the Linux universe... which is tacitly untrue. I never said that eve
26.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
>I understand that you use GNOME and are passionate about it, but your insistence on right and wrong answers is absolutely not what drives the Linux community. So your statements here aren't correct. Please avoid accusing me of bein
27.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
>Not every application needs a UI toolkit. There are also a lot of UI toolkits. Now many of them struggle with the fairly unimpressive task of displaying a window with reasonable looking borders. That's not a good user experience, a
28.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
>This is your problem, and GNOME's too: GNOME doesn't own the Linux desktop. I'm sorry I have no idea what you mean. This is not about the Linux desktop, this is about GNOME. If you don't want to support GNOME then th
29.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
I've noticed a lot of smaller creativity/productivity apps are not available in distro repos. They're far too niche to get attention from distro packagers. However a lot of them are in Flathub and they work on any distro. I f
30.
▲
by
BrightGlow
5y ago
I don't really want to argue with you but I think you're still basing this on false information or on misconceptions, I'll try to clear things up. Of course you are free to use or not use whatever packaging solution you want
More ›