Braxton1980

6 ms·

1.
by Braxton1980 1mo ago
I'm confused because you offer up that it might have always been this way but without evidence then ask us if that's the case.
2.
by Braxton1980 2mo ago
Didn't the US previously make a deal then Trump broke it?
3.
by Braxton1980 2mo ago
Who has been saying that?
4.
by Braxton1980 2mo ago
Why does the amount of money mattter and not the actions taken? Trump has done more pro israel actions than Biden
5.
by Braxton1980 2mo ago
>Edit: downvoted to -3. Did i say anything that was untrue? Or do people not like the trutH Isn't it an oversimplification to say there are no good guys? O
6.
by Braxton1980 2mo ago
Perhaps we could get the video files and burn them to a disc like disc that can be played back in a special machine
7.
by Braxton1980 2mo ago
Dumb regulation being subjective
8.
by Braxton1980 3mo ago
Because Trump has 2.5 years left and they may be hoping a Democrat wins
9.
by Braxton1980 3mo ago
What about the mass suffering the US boycott has caused?
10.
by Braxton1980 3mo ago
>Marco Rubio’s quest to fix Cuba is a reflection of Cuban immigrants values. How do you know that's his motivation? There are countless countries around the world that need to be fixed
11.
by Braxton1980 3mo ago
You're being sarcastic when the alternative can be a more reasonable retirement option
12.
by Braxton1980 4mo ago
Would Eurofins be able to set up monitoring on Tesla's property? What other sources would have similar pollutants to a Lithium factory? It seems pretty specific and if there was some other obvious source why wouldn't Tesla point t
13.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
> A prosecutor would have to prove that you have knowingly and wilfully committed the crime in order to be convicted Why can't I just say "I didn't know I was speeding, prove I did it wilfully"
14.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
Isn't that assumed? Obviously Apple can't check every iPhone owner to see if they have been hacked now or in the past
15.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
>Some portion of them likely did not vote with this specific policy in mind. Their fault. The Republican party has been quite open about being a against environmentalism and related policies.
16.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
1.They weren't equally bad. 2. Not voting still results in one being elected. This isn't the same as being offered two foods you don't like and declining to eat either. 3. The judgment on the quality of the candidates is like
17.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
The voters are the source of the problem and we need to focus on them instead of Trump because once he is gone they'll just elect another piece of shit. A large portion of the population doesn't vote but if they understand the rea
18.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
>The Democratic party often sounds like a bunch of elitists Can you give an example of a Democrat politician making elitist statements? How do you know this feeling isn't the result of propaganda by the Republican party and their ne
19.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
Voters?
20.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
Not voting is a choice and the same as voting for the winner
21.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
"Both sides" Both candidates weren't equally bad. That is always the situation and you must choose the least worse or best candidate.
22.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
Ok? And? The majority voted to move in one direction then the majority wanted to reverse it.
23.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
Neither party will ever be perfect. One is better than the other.
24.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
The only idiots are the people who voted for Trump
25.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
The majority of tax payers voted for this to happen
26.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
The reason we ended with RFK is because of the massive number of lies Trump and his allies told compared to the Democrats, the majority of people are not sufficiently intelligent to overcome this, and the economy.
27.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
Why does it imply that?
28.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
>The problem is fundamentally that censoring something discredits you rather than them. Why?
29.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
>It doesn’t matter how blue you die your hair What is the relevance of this statement?
30.
by Braxton1980 6mo ago
Is the number of people high enough to make them right? For example if one doctor says I have cancer but 100 electricians say I don't I'm cancer free

More ›