Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Brandon-Coll
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
Ask HN: How do relay servers prevent direct peer IP exposure?
1 points
by
Brandon-Coll
21d ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
What does xPal's NIST CAVP validation cover?
(csrc.nist.gov)
1 points
by
Brandon-Coll
21d ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
Ask HN: How zero-server apps sync keys and chat history securely across devices?
2 points
by
Brandon-Coll
29d ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
Are xPal Total and Remote Wipeout, Terminate Mode Meaningful for Privacy?
2 points
by
Brandon-Coll
1mo ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
Ask HN: Does xPal's privacy model solve problems other messengers have not?
1 points
by
Brandon-Coll
1mo ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
by
Brandon-Coll
1mo ago
That is and can be one way to establish trust, but most users won't know the people behind the software. do you think trust can be earned through things like security architecture, independent validation, audits, and collecting as litt
7.
▲
by
Brandon-Coll
1mo ago
so if the closed source platforms are independently audited by DEKRA and verified by NIST CAVP cryptography, still hard to trust?
8.
▲
by
Brandon-Coll
1mo ago
Fair, but open source also automatically does not mean more trustworthy. What matters is what can actually be independently verified about the software you are running. what is you take on this? also I believe the potent security features m
9.
▲
Ask HN: What would convince you that a closed source messaging app is secure?
3 points
by
Brandon-Coll
1mo ago
|
15 comments
10.
▲
by
Brandon-Coll
1mo ago
well put. I'd add third-party audits to thelist. independent security audits together create a much stronger trust model but regular and different for respective analysis
11.
▲
by
Brandon-Coll
1mo ago
so if an app is not open-source, it's credibility as secure, private or encrypted becomes questionable? and if an app has code open, that's mean it is absolutely trustworthy? what is your take on this?
12.
▲
For an app claiming end-to-end encryption, what evidence would earn your trust?
3 points
by
Brandon-Coll
1mo ago
|
6 comments
13.
▲
What xPal Learned Putting a Consumer Messenger Through NIST's CAVP Validation
(xpalapp.substack.com)
1 points
by
Brandon-Coll
2mo ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
Engineering behind the xPal private messaging app cross-device message deletion
(xpalapp.substack.com)
5 points
by
Brandon-Coll
2mo ago
|
1 comments
15.
▲
by
Brandon-Coll
2mo ago
xPal’s greatest priority is privacy and giving users complete control over their conversations. To achieve this, xPal has engineered one-of-a-kind advanced deletion mechanisms, including Terminate™ Mode, Total Wipeout™ Mode, Remote Wipeout™
16.
▲
XPal Launches Desktop App for Windows, macOS, and Browser
(xpalapp.substack.com)
1 points
by
Brandon-Coll
2mo ago
|
1 comments
17.
▲
by
Brandon-Coll
2mo ago
xPal Desktop is now available for Windows and macOS. It securely synchronizes conversations with your mobile device using QR-based device pairing, WebRTC, and WebSockets. Each device maintains its own encryption keys stored in secure on-de
18.
▲
A Secure Communication Platform Protects in Digital and Real-World Situations
(xpalapp.substack.com)
1 points
by
Brandon-Coll
2mo ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
by
Brandon-Coll
4mo ago
Wire deserves to be in there, you are right. We actually have a dedicated xPal vs Wire breakdown here https://xpal.com/blogs/xpal-vs-wire-which-is-better-for-busi...
20.
▲
Secure Messaging Apps Have Solved Encryption. The Rest Is the Problem
(xpalapp.substack.com)
7 points
by
Brandon-Coll
4mo ago
|
3 comments
21.
▲
xPal Secure Messenger: Your Private Life Is Nobody's Business
(xpalapp.substack.com)
2 points
by
Brandon-Coll
4mo ago
|
1 comments