BottingRocks

40 ms·

1. 1.▲
   ShapeSecurity's JavaScript VM: Part 3(botting.rocks)

   9 points by BottingRocks 3y ago|1 comments
2. 2.▲
   by BottingRocks 3y ago

   This is Part 3 of my series of reversing ShapeSecurity's VM. I have a few more to go. This will only talk about the VM and not the signals and if you need to catch up ready part 1 and 2 that are posted on my blog.
3. 3.▲
   by BottingRocks 3y ago

   Thanks I appreciated so much. This project took many months for me to do as I had no guidance or proper knowledge on how to approach the problem.
4. 4.▲
   ShapeSecurity's JavaScript VM: Part 2(botting.rocks)

   12 points by BottingRocks 3y ago|1 comments
5. 5.▲
   by BottingRocks 3y ago

   This is part 2 of the series: ShapeSecurity's VM. There will be many more parts to come guys stay tuned.
6. 6.▲
   by BottingRocks 3y ago

   Here is some of the feedback. In terms of bot protection you would get a 1/10. Perhaps, a 2/10 on a good day. First, your payload is being sent using base64 encoded using the default alphabet. You only need a simple atob() to decr
7. 7.▲
   by BottingRocks 3y ago

   I believe that in the last couple of years the line between donation and begging has been blurred. You have things on the extreme side like people begging on tiktok live doing shoutouts to every viewer that donates a significant gift.On the
8. 8.▲
   ShapeSecurity's JavaScript VM: Part 1(botting.rocks)

   2 points by BottingRocks 3y ago|3 comments
9. 9.▲
   by BottingRocks 3y ago

   A series into ShapeSecurity's VM