Bluerise

10 ms·

1.
by Bluerise 5y ago
I'm running OpenBSD on it with an amdgpu WX2100 card, works nicely.
2.
by Bluerise 6y ago
OpenBSD obviously doesn't have NVIDIA support, but amdgpu(4) works pretty well. I'd also prefer to use AMD's own GPU, not only because I can't use NVIDIA, but also because I don't support NVIDIA's business prac
3.
by Bluerise 6y ago
First of all the feature wasn't available in the initial Big Sur release and it only got available during the Betas for the first minor patch. Second of all, some Apple developer stated on Twitter that (during M1 unveil) he's fina
4.
by Bluerise 7y ago
No, it‘s a completely new implementation. The whole backend and frontend is written from the ground up.
5.
by Bluerise 11y ago
Which patches from Bitrig are you exactly talking about?
6.
by Bluerise 11y ago
Bitrig does not have support for ZFS. Must be something different from Bitrig the poster is talking about.
7.
by Bluerise 11y ago
The difference is that the rPi blobs actually run on the GPU, the CPU is unharmed. Still, both have access to the same memory. But that's a similar issue on the PC.
8.
by Bluerise 11y ago
I'm sorry, but that is wrong. The main blobs are being run on the GPU, as bootloaders, even before the actual operating system is loaded. OpenBSD does not need to run _any_ blob itself. There used to be a 3d graphics driver blob, but a
9.
by Bluerise 11y ago
I did read them. Now and a few months back. Janne raises concerns about running a blob on the CPU (which does not happen), while Stuart explains the boot stages correctly in detail and compares it to very similar issues on newer x86 technol
10.
by Bluerise 11y ago
OpenBSD does not run on the rPi because there are only a handful developers taking care of the arm subtree, and none of them have time for it or are simply not interested. Heck, their whole arm subtree has been rotting and needs some major
11.
by Bluerise 11y ago
http://www.square-up.org/
12.
by Bluerise 12y ago
That is true. OpenBSD/Theo refuses to take part in embargos, which means they don't get a heads up. Don't have a citation right now, but Theo said that publicly when Hardbleed or so happened.
13.
by Bluerise 12y ago
The funny thing is that even though they have OpenCVS in their source tree, they do not use it. It never took off and probably had too many bugs and issues. Instead they are and have been using GNU CVS instead. OpenCVS was linked to the nor
14.
by Bluerise 12y ago
For me personally, better armv7 support. Even though many things stem from our hands, NetBSD and FreeBSD are a great resource. I have already started working on SMP support, based on their example. Otherwise I do not have any NetBSD stuff i
15.
by Bluerise 12y ago
Bitrig developer here, feel free to shoot questions!
16.
Bitrig 1.0 released(bitrig.org)
2 points by Bluerise 12y ago|0 comments
17.
by Bluerise 12y ago
They wrote their own. A completely new implementation.
18.
by Bluerise 12y ago
OpenBSD did not want to be on the list of distros to be notified[0]. It's no conspiracy due to LibreSSL, but maybe rather Theo's ignorance. [0] http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=139906348230995&w=2
19.
Bitrig switches to the libc++ C++ standard library(marc.info)
1 points by Bluerise 12y ago|0 comments
20.
by Bluerise 12y ago
Bitrig is working on support though. The devs have a few Exynos based devices, including that particular one.
21.
by Bluerise 12y ago
Have a look at i.MX6 based machines. Namely CuBox-i, HummingBoard, SABRE Lite and Wandboard. The Utilite is fine, too.
22.
by Bluerise 12y ago
They don't care about that. Their main interest is to have a library conforming to OpenBSD standards.
23.
by Bluerise 12y ago
> A9 core rather than the virtualization-ready A15? (I'd rather have a 64-bit ARM but those are still a ways out) There aren't really many choices. Samsung has A15 cores, but it's probably hard to get and there's _no_
24.
by Bluerise 12y ago
I have been waiting for some time for the crowdfunding campaign. The FreeScale i.MX6 platform is very versatile. Up to quad core 1.2GHz, SATA, PCIe, Gigabit Ethernet (limited to 480Mbps) and lots of good documentation and driver support. T
25.
NoSSL – security for your website | Indiegogo(indiegogo.com)
2 points by Bluerise 12y ago|0 comments
26.
by Bluerise 13y ago
Agreed, this is really well designed and beautiful. I would love to use that for my personal timekeeping.
27.
by Bluerise 13y ago
What about Bitrig?
28.
by Bluerise 13y ago
You should print it or write it down and store it in a secure place.
29.
by Bluerise 13y ago
Cyphertite[1] works very will for encrypted backups. It splits your data in chunks, encrypts them on the fly while sending them to the cloud. It doesn't use much space, apart from a little metadata, and you don't have to worry ab
30.
by Bluerise 13y ago
OpenBSD people? OpenSSH people!

More ›