BestGuess

5 ms·

1.
by BestGuess 3y ago
>Your “carte Blanche fair use” claim is nonsense Since you seem to not be aware of this: Fair use is an affirmative defense. By definition nothing I have written is therefore "carte blanche" as no defense of fair use can be eve
2.
by BestGuess 3y ago
>but a cursory glance at the actual legality shows that you’re lying [[citation needed]] >a somewhat ambiguous grey area at the moment That's a funny way of admitting I'm right. >It is also massively frowned upon in art s
3.
by BestGuess 3y ago
>but it is still fundamentally just copying, pasting, and then deforming lines together That's called "photobashing", very common to see used by concept artists. Also, it's fair use. So now you've got a bigger pr
4.
by BestGuess 3y ago
>Aye, there's the rub ;) How do you define "too similar"? ... Same ways I do for humans. That's why I wrote "the same as for people" that line was supposed to contextualize everything else I wrote and someho
5.
by BestGuess 3y ago
>When things seem so obvious and simple, it can be a good mental exercise to try to put yourself in the shoes of the "other side" for whom it also seems obvious and simple. I would if I could but as I keep tryin to explain I ca
6.
by BestGuess 3y ago
See this kind of thing here is what I think is a problem and has been a problem forever. We have two opposite laws on this, 1. Copying is theft (contents of a CD [software], movies, stuff on a website sometimes, etc) 2. Copying is not theft
7.
by BestGuess 3y ago
The line is pretty simple for me, because it's the same line that applies to people. It doesn't matter what the training set is so long as it is not reproducing either the same thing or too similar to the thing it's trained f
8.
by BestGuess 3y ago
Yeah, I am equally confused and I fear the law is going to royally bungle this one and we'll be stuck with something really stupid for some arbitrary number of decades or generations. It just seems obvious to me that "human made t
9.
by BestGuess 3y ago
That doesn't make any sense to me as a line, as the human set up the machine to generate some way to generate images. The human still did "it", the "it" is just one step removed, and we've tons of things where
10.
by BestGuess 3y ago
That's too real and gosh dang horrifyin
11.
by BestGuess 3y ago
Yeah you see that a lot when all of a sudden every single one in the US market yanks out every affordable option all at the same time or "mysteriously" makes them impossible to buy but somehow that isn't collusion or anything
12.
by BestGuess 3y ago
That's not fair. More like "cannot afford" as in can't afford to live anywhere close enough to anything paying enough to afford to live near enough to work for it. Add to that XXXL trucks and giant SUV's that can&#x
13.
by BestGuess 3y ago
> They're really not supposed to be litigators of "what actually happened," which may not be knowable seems like best thing would be to be able to say "this is not verifiable" or similar. seems to me these issue
14.
by BestGuess 3y ago
Seems to me it'd be a lot more high quality if you could simply have points about truth or things being opinions, or speculation, or rumors, or myth, stuff like that. Or simply noting there's disagreement or things about truth. Ma
15.
by BestGuess 3y ago
See what I mean? Book just repeats the myth in my mind, though as you say I guess a tweak of the myth. But you're Exactly right. Said by who? According to what? It's just a claim, and in my opinion contradicted by every single pub
16.
by BestGuess 3y ago
Well maybe I'm a bumpkin but seems to be the fix is the truth, and if the truth ain't clear there's no reason you can't have explanations or explain claims repeated elsewhere aren't evident in something like source
17.
by BestGuess 3y ago
Don't even have to be about science, it can just be random little myths that spring up people try to correct. I happen to know stuff about firearms, got quite a few, from one of those places people can have quite a few. One day I'
18.
by BestGuess 3y ago
How readable is it for someone who doesn't know much about this kind of thing?
19.
by BestGuess 3y ago
seems to me like that's what we've got right now sadly
20.
by BestGuess 3y ago
problem is that stance is like a vicious cycle. Can't get worthwhile employment screws everything from your family to your social life, worse if you can't drive anymore too, and all that is right back into why those people would b
21.
by BestGuess 3y ago
I reckon it has got to do with bein rural and poor, or maybe different kinds of european family cultures preserving different attitudes? Where I'm from in the south you didn't ask at all if you knew what was good for you all about
22.
by BestGuess 3y ago
problem is nobody blowin the whistle on that and it'd involve a lot of hands. Might be more like occupy made companies aware of an untapped market and they saturated it with virtue signaling trying to get that youth money instead. mayb
23.
by BestGuess 3y ago
I think it's because of how memory works so it's like asking "okay but what if I had a different brain" I wish. Retrieving what you learn is the best way I know to remember what you're learning, so writing about it
24.
by BestGuess 3y ago
I write a lot but don't publish anything anywhere. It's kind of like that bo burnham song "look who's inside again". I feel like when I share anything I think, no matter how revised, detailed or not, whatever advice
25.
by BestGuess 3y ago
As something of a dumdum myself I think I know why. Corporations want people to be able to do their thing as easy as possible to make money, while people not directly motivated like that and not motivated to make it as easy as possible can
26.
by BestGuess 3y ago
that right there is what they call a conflict of interest. or what we says down here "speakin out both sides o'yer yap"
27.
by BestGuess 3y ago
Wherever you draw the line someone's going to be upset at where the line is. You're echoing the other guy's concern, really everyone's concern. Same issue with everything from criminal justice to government all around so
28.
by BestGuess 3y ago
alright. thanks for your thoughts
29.
by BestGuess 3y ago
cool beans. I didn't think about it like that. Could be.
30.
by BestGuess 3y ago
I don't know about neither of those. How is it intrinsic? What stops detection improving just because AI gets better? Assuming it just doesn't become sentient human replica or something I mean AI like this where it's just a l

More ›