BFatts

5 ms·

1.
by BFatts 5y ago
Maybe if they dose with some hydroxycholorquine, ivermectin, and shoot some UV up their bum, they will get AMAZING protection??
2.
by BFatts 5y ago
Why 5 years? Why not 1? Why not 50? What's so special to people about 5 years? I keep hearing people say "it hasn't been tested long enough" followed by "I'd take it in about 5 to 10 years" which is a HUGE
3.
by BFatts 5y ago
There are reports of Lee, or one of his contacts, offering admin roles for money basically to allow for paid harassment. Whether that is true or not isn't clear to me, but that would be a big issue if true.
4.
by BFatts 5y ago
Some people really don't like Trump, myself included. Some people find opportunity to stick it to him - so what? I find it funny that a man who so values his notoriety is then defended for his notoriety by those same people who value t
5.
by BFatts 5y ago
Censorship, by a company? On their own platform? How is that possible? As far as I know, only government cannot abridge your right to speech. A platform, like a store, has the right to remove those that use their platform to promote speech
6.
by BFatts 6y ago
Trillian!
7.
by BFatts 6y ago
The far-right panders to extreme fear while the far-left panders to extreme progress. I'd much rather work with the far-left than the far-right.
8.
by BFatts 6y ago
Tariffs don't hurt the producer as much as the consumer. But stupid politicians will tell you otherwise because they think they are smart!
9.
by BFatts 6y ago
Did you read the article? The point of the study is to say that statistically this doesn't add up. Well, Covid is a once in every 100 years pandemic. Heart disease, influenza, and pneumonia occur every year. Trying to use statistical a
10.
by BFatts 6y ago
Why is it suspect? When someone dies of influenza in a year, but has heart disease, do we say they died of heart disease or influenza? I suspect influenza is the cause of death. Statistically, over the past 100 years we haven't HAD a p
11.
by BFatts 6y ago
Why would the American Left need to? Look, it's obvious how easy this is to manipulate. Tell people that every year people die at higher rates of these four causes, but in 2020 we don't see that happen but the Covid numbers are wh
12.
by BFatts 6y ago
The title seems misleading to me. Does the fact that "...blood samples from a cohort of more than 2,000 clinical and non-clinical healthcare workers..." might seem to indicate a near-constant exposure to SARS-cov-2? That might inc
13.
by BFatts 6y ago
The first thing that struck me was "what about drugs that have little-to-no bioavailability after being ingested?" Would it make it possible to give drugs that are rejected for other reasons?
14.
by BFatts 6y ago
Putting kids in cages isn't as bad as the Uighurs? Separating families at the border isn't similar? C'mon... we are just as shitty in the US as other countries any more.
15.
by BFatts 6y ago
"Intentionally interfered in out domestic policies" Which ones, pray tell?
16.
by BFatts 6y ago
Apple, Google, Twitter, Facebook ALL operate in China without being SOLD to the Chinese government. So, why should we enforce a ban on TikTok only...? I know this isn't the forum for it, but I'll just put the FACT out there: Trump
17.
by BFatts 6y ago
I think we're seeing the difference between someone who is a programmer and someone who plays a programmer at work. :) Arguing that some modern, complex feature is "better than" a simpler system is crazy talk. Any time I can
18.
by BFatts 6y ago
That's a fantastic point. Most people in technology these days look at a problem and immediately think things like "more hardware" or "cloud deployment" all to get scalability. Scalability can come in forms other th
19.
by BFatts 6y ago
The over-usage of the "-gate" addition to anything that people take issue with is getting old as fuck. Seriously, can people not come up with something better? Also, is it truly a conspiracy? That's what an association to Wat
20.
by BFatts 6y ago
I'm not sure you can call bullshit on someone's "perception". It's an opinion - if he sees it as slower, then he sees it as slower. Nothing you can do will convince his brain to see it faster.
21.
by BFatts 6y ago
I'm generally against Assange on all of this. Hacking is an illegal activity that results in the disclosure of information that the hacker does not own. This is theft of information and a federal offense. Anyone engaging is nefarious h
22.
by BFatts 6y ago
I find it interesting that people automatically assume nefarious reasons for accessing the clipboard... If your privacy is so important, don't use platforms you cannot trust. If that means not using a smart phone, then maybe you will d
23.
by BFatts 6y ago
Do we need another strongly typed language that compiles to JavaScript? If that's so important, why don't people use C/C++ and compile that to WASM for best performance too? We've got TypeScript... is it necessary to hav
24.
by BFatts 6y ago
This sounds really whiney... almost like Trump drafted it for him.
25.
by BFatts 6y ago
Uh, secret meetings and confidential cover-ups? This reads more like a spy novel than a trustworthy document. Sorry.
26.
by BFatts 6y ago
I still believe it would have. The information regarding COVID-19 has been evolving since the beginning, 24/7 which has lead to the "truth" changing repeatedly. Also, Trump has huge support from his business buddies, includin
27.
by BFatts 6y ago
There are several points that contradict the consensus opinion, at this time. Such as the statement "More schools should reopen in June as ‘children are not the transmitters of this virus’" is totally refuted at this point. There
28.
by BFatts 6y ago
It says, in the email provided, exactly what must be done: Change the required permissions - your scope is too broad.
29.
by BFatts 6y ago
That's really cool!
30.
by BFatts 6y ago
To be clear, no one is asking to stay inside - everyone wants the economy reopened again. But, there's the sensible way and there's the stupid way. The latter method involves just going to back to the way things were and pretend t

More ›