Athanase000

6 ms·

1.
by Athanase000 14d ago
I think the person you are answering to was saying the same thing. They wrote "worth" instead of "worse".
2.
by Athanase000 1mo ago
I guess a weakness of the common benchmarks (artificial intelligence, gertlabs, and others) is that, from my understanding, they don't really cater to each language's specificity. If a language such as CL or Clojure boasts a super
3.
by Athanase000 1mo ago
I really don't understand this argument. The "opening tab" in Python has to be matched with an "absence of tab". I don't see any non-cosmetic difference between Python and curly brace languages.
4.
by Athanase000 2mo ago
Every time something is posted from Wolfram I realize I am the only guy who likes him. Yes, he does not state, or prove, theorems. He is studying alien mathematics. Nobody has any idea of what is going on, neither does Wolfram, but he is tr
5.
by Athanase000 2mo ago
It does not matter to me. As long as the prose is good and the arguments are well-exposed I don't mind if an AI wrote it or a human. It would be different if we were talking about music, art or literature. But for science I care about
6.
by Athanase000 2mo ago
When I was in mathematics, reading other people's work was always more rewarding to me than doing my own. I would spend years on a question to get some progress, versus spending a few days or weeks reading a paper to enjoy something ne
7.
by Athanase000 2mo ago
The way the LLM describes its own work at the end is hilarious.
8.
by Athanase000 2mo ago
Is there a site or github repository that aggregates all these non-trivial AI-solved results?
9.
by Athanase000 2mo ago
Have you used Claude Design? The site has all the hallmarks of it.
10.
by Athanase000 2mo ago
There is so many low quality projects that rely on vibe coded websites and vibe written copy, that this becomes a smell, to the detriment of projects like OP's which is genuinely interesting and looks like high quality, well-crafted so