Aperocky

4 ms·

1.
by Aperocky 6d ago
I'd say you only pay 10% of the cost when you finish/launch the re-written software. The other 90% of cost comes later in the format of operations, deprecation and migration, people both users and devs, community friction and lear
2.
by Aperocky 6d ago
I think in time people will realize harness is essentially a more complicated .vimrc or .zshrc; And yes, you can install gigantic plugins in those places - e.g. Codex; but the point is everyone will have exactly what they have customized to
3.
by Aperocky 7d ago
This looks like colloquial mandarin translated to english word for word. This is almost exactly how mandarin is spoken in colloquial communication, context is almost always omitted if provided once, and grammar/tense is mostly non-exis
4.
by Aperocky 7d ago
I'd much prefer this over agents that enthusiastically implements whatever they are asked to do and make up whatever information they think is missing.
5.
by Aperocky 8d ago
Paper trades are more lenient afaik? You won't run into actual transaction problems particularly when market fluctuates by the milliseconds.
6.
by Aperocky 27d ago
Is it luck or bold product and marketing decision? Being first could be luck, or it can be foresight.
7.
by Aperocky 29d ago
One of the biggest reason I migrated to Codex. I'd like to see each agentic CLI process as a simple building block, and having 100 claude session means I sometimes run out of memory (and I have 256GB of them). Codex never have this pro
8.
by Aperocky 1mo ago
It seems like they tried to remove guidance from multi-agent system. And I think it's going to fare as well as removal of guidance from single-agent interactions. In my experience, no matter how many agent runs for a single goal, one o
9.
by Aperocky 1mo ago
It feels like a great product but targeted at a surprisingly transient customer base. The cycling guys won't buy it, they want the watts from their legs. The commuters will just get an ebike eventually. The getting started crowd will e
10.
by Aperocky 1mo ago
You would expect someone following quant trading to have sensitivities to quantity, but alas.
11.
by Aperocky 1mo ago
> not available to 99.999999999999999999% There are not enough human 25 years old in history for this many 9s. You had 21 nines, which would only make sense if there were 10 billion billion humans ever and that he is the only one. Howeve
12.
by Aperocky 1mo ago
This is so ironically on point. I recall reading a shampoo bottle in the bathroom maybe 25 years ago because there was nothing else to read. Meanwhile now you are correctly complaining about how weird the scrolling feels like.
13.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
You can only control the compute if it is not commoditized, which at the current moment, it is not, leading to industry players having 75-80% margins. Someone will find a way to make cheaper compute, and since nothing fundamental changed th
14.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/topics/open-weight/ Amazon is listed as signatory, I doubt microsoft just decided for them.
15.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
> If your worth is not determined by your productivity, then what remains of you underneath it all? Worth and productivity are synonyms in direction, wouldn't a better phrase not track either? It's difficult to answer anything
16.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
Amazon did sign it though...
17.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
Keep seeing this trope again and again. By same logic are open source code "open source"? If we don't see the development environment attached to these projects, are they truly open source? Heck, why not include software phil
18.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
The peak was in 2014, far before any coherent AI became a thing. As someone with substantial "points" accumulated all a full decade ago, I can easily see why. If you only allow certain opinions and criteria for specific subjects,
19.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
> humanities, creativity, entertainment, or financial transparency > monetizing these strengths > real advantage over China is freedom Please tell me if I'm unfairly paraphrasing but these seem to be your main argument and the
20.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
I use a mixture of claude code and codex and kiro as my swarm. They communicate through my own harness, and it's working pretty well so far. claude code is being overtaken by codex however because I noticed lately the accuracy of the l
21.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
As someone who is on the other side, the amount of familiar, LLM generated reports are overwhelming and usually falls under "not familiar with product design/security scope" category. But there are also really good ones - so
22.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
I am sort of a no UI (except browser) user for a very long time now, and vim is still incredibly useful. Granted, the language servers are getting dusted, but it's much nicer to write goals in markdown in vim and send it to LLM in a se
23.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
You're describing the mac mini/studio with some facelift.
24.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
But why should apple invest in developing their own models? Why would it be correct? Or phrase it in a very similar ask, why don't they invest in power plants? The model space is truly crowded, what do they gain or recover suppose they
25.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
If you end up with 2 to 3 times more code. That is HORRIBLE, because it means about 50-66% of the code is otherwise unnecessary. Those are eventually going to become unmaintainable garbage. However, if you get 2 to 3 times the code in the i
26.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
The issue with these kind of porting is edge case bugs - far smaller project/physic simulation has hit the same thing especially when original code isn't exactly clean, or sometimes only worked because of a logic bug. This means y
27.
by Aperocky 2mo ago
This article is rated 100% on my AI smell meter, making it less trustworthy despite convincing arguments. For instance, I'm now really only sure that author measured a 2000 ppm CO2 in a meeting room once. Everything else could just be
28.
by Aperocky 3mo ago
Thank you - I was very close but thanks to chores and availability haven't pulled the trigger. You are very convincing.
29.
by Aperocky 3mo ago
> When I walk into my office and sit at my desk, I’m choosing to be there. When I walk away, I have a door I can close, and a life outside the room that the digital world is no longer allowed to reach. Being intentional is hard, and a li
30.
by Aperocky 3mo ago
That's a natural result of introducing LLM to current standard software development without modifying the rest of it (the part that doesn't involve creating code).

More ›