AnonCoward4

5 ms·

1.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
That quote sounds a lot like 1. (the idea of compressing each Bayer color), but I might misunderstand it.
2.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
It's noteworthy for sure, however I am more annoyed by how it is reported. It was always like that for sure, however when the same medium proclaims being the arbiter of truth (fact checkers) I get really disgusted.
3.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
Circular logic. Because Russian crimes are documented (in western media) every war crime attributed to Russians must be true as well.
4.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
If it was from RT I would add "According to Russian media". Is that then a barely noteworthy western propaganda line or just the truth?
5.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
> I’m bored of Netflix. They have simply gone the assembly line direction instead of the direction of art, at least for some big niches. For example, every True Crime docuseries on Netflix is the same crap. My benchmark for this genre is
6.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
> That's very difficult to say, actually; the Moskova was sunk with them after all, but the bigger issue is the abhorrent and indiscriminate shelling of civilian populations by the Russians. Fields with farmers and homes and hospita
7.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
In Germany this is called "Gratismut" (gratis bravery). It's the current thing to hate Russia, so they don't lose anything by doing a passionate write-up about it. McDonald's also wants to convince you that they hav
8.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
I disagree that physical violence is justified for any anonymous conversation however hateful it might be. If it is not anonymous then there are things like slander where things get more blurry, however I am not a strong proponent of vigila
9.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
Yeah, however that is not what happens if you just let that behavior described above slide. Punching someone because they said something to you is usually wrong especially if they don't even know each other (so it can't be persona
10.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
Which means the internet is the better place to be for any person. The problem is usually if one side is not anonymous, then it's different, otherwise anything is fair game in regards to discussions I think, but maybe you find a good c
11.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
> It's impossible to convince most people of even the most obvious truths. You should maybe ask yourself why you need to convince them. > The wisest path is to fake agreement, keep your thoughts for yourself and move away ASAP. T
12.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
I agree with that assessment. Which means it should come as no surprise to anyone, if people are harsher online to people they literally do not know. It's not nice, but the alternative is also not very pleasant, which is real life and
13.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
(Disclaimer: I'm not from the US.) > It's primarily the labor-heavy working-class white male (in the white male demographic) that has been brutalized by changes in the US and global economy. They have been left behind to drown
14.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
As far as I know you can't sensibly OD on LSD for example. It doesn't really cause addiction and to OD you need to take something like 100x the effective dose.However the psychosis danger would still be a valid concern ("roll
15.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
And in addition to that they also removed a lot of rail lines, especially goods traffic. It would've been a boon to have fewer trucks on the motorway and probably better for the environment.
16.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
> Would you not accept that African-Americans might be victims of circumstances? I don't introduce new standards for them. If you want to mitigate racism, hold them accountable for their actions and don't act like people with a
17.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
> I am sorry, but if I were you, I'd be ashamed to use such justification for people's killings. It's a statistic, that is more relevant than plain population share.
18.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
This is disingenious at best. Looking at the population ratio vs killing makes no sense whatsoever. In that case just use that to justify why men are more often subject to police violence than women. We all know why, but with race there may
19.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
> Drive is something we can choose and cultivate. That sounds like hybris. I am not disagreeing that you can alter it to a degree, but it is certainly not something you choose. Just think about how you feel when you are ill and now think
20.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
> Maybe that's the thing. More coherence might be nicer, yes. But it might also not make UIs easier to use. Maybe sqeezing apps into a tight framework of UI coherence, makes the overall appearance of what's on the screen more a
21.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
> But, take a natively designed application from Windows 2000, and it's extremely easy to understand and use! And, dare I say it, more pleasing to the eye than flashy, animated graphics of today. Coming from that era, I strongly dis
22.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
For me a language is easier to learn if I can actually use it. For me his rule of thumb is less a rule and more like how my mind works (and to agree all I guess). I can memorize unused facts, but it gets lost in big life changes usually whi
23.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
You could double the battery size and still only have one day of light to medium usage. Battery optimization especially in idle is important.
24.
by AnonCoward4 4y ago
I disagree that this is premature, but best practice. This example is actually a small lesson how this autocomplete can construct slightly less readable code. Of course not really a problem of the tool as you have to refactor anyway.
25.
by AnonCoward4 5y ago
> E.g., would you not agree that while we can ask McDonalds to stop doing business in Russia, it would be a crime for them to start poisoning their Russian customers? In the current climate I am not sure anymore that people would disagre
26.
by AnonCoward4 5y ago
I want to see that spreadsheet.
27.
by AnonCoward4 5y ago
> I have no idea why modding a microwave at a third-party service center would be illegal. If you remove the source of revenue for a given product without consent of the manufacturer/developer of that product and do this in a profes
28.
by AnonCoward4 5y ago
If you open up a shop where you do this (for free) I kind of think you ask to be sued. At any rate real world analoga often don't do the digital problems justice. PS.: I imply that the "beep" is the source of revenue of cours
29.
by AnonCoward4 5y ago
It's not measureable. First of you need to account for many having the same weapons (MAD) and you also need to account for the knowledge of the impact of these weapons. The knowledge does change the probability for someone willing and
30.
by AnonCoward4 5y ago
I guess you mean fusion. Fission is what we currently have/use for power plants. Even there research might end up in a better solution, because nuclear energy is actually a good source of energy because it is so dense. But current impl

More ›