AmigoCharlie

6 ms·

1.
by AmigoCharlie 9mo ago
Autoexec, don't you feel a little bit like Rhea Seehorn as "Carol" in her struggle with the hive-mind humanity of "Pluribus"? It looks as in this discussion there is a lot of anti-car hivemind at play...
2.
by AmigoCharlie 9mo ago
Autoexec, here, is simply right. Congestion price could be redefined as the "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses and keep them f**ing out of the city center" price
3.
by AmigoCharlie 2y ago
... it's almost as Claude Computer Use could (and will) just replace you entirely, huh?
4.
by AmigoCharlie 2y ago
Your concern is very clear and very appropriate. Hironically, I feel that those who seem to not understand what you're implying, even if they are open to prepping, in an Apocalypse wouldn't fare that well: as the basic requirement
5.
by AmigoCharlie 2y ago
"But some people think they need their car because they think they need to move a lot of stuff regularly, for instance between their home and their parents, and their parents don't leave in a place easily reachable without a car.
6.
by AmigoCharlie 2y ago
Also extremely rigid ideologies and a Pol-Pot-like approach to reality (as if in: "If someone does something that I don't like, he should not be allowed to do it") have huge externalities.
7.
by AmigoCharlie 3y ago
Look, isn't remotely assisted driving something unbelievably stupid? Why should I rely, when I am on my "driverless" car, rely on someone else who is remote, need to be updated at all times about the situation (when things ca
8.
by AmigoCharlie 3y ago
It looks a little bit idiotic to me. Imagine how much effort should your eyes take in order to keep focus on all these minute elements, windows, fonts, and so on, which happen to be also so near to your eyes. I think that after 30 minutes l
9.
by AmigoCharlie 3y ago
Right. And these types could be called "cyclo-talibans" as they want to impose their will upon unconsenting car owners.