AaronI

6 ms·

1.
by AaronI 13y ago
They have 20 days to respond to the initial request. If they don't respond, the first step should be to submit an administrative appeal to the FOIA contact for the agency. They have 20 days to respond to your appeal. If that appeal is
2.
by AaronI 13y ago
A good place to start is http://www.foia.gov/ The specific information required for a request varies by agency, as do any fees. Most of them now provide online forms on their sites. While I was the FOIA/Privacy Act coo
3.
by AaronI 13y ago
Use of the privilege is not based on the type of proceeding (ie, it applies to more than just criminal cases), but upon the nature of the statement or admission and the exposure that would invite. Precedent has shown self-incrimination is e
4.
by AaronI 13y ago
I doubt it has to do with labor laws, specifically. Payment is paid through a verified Paypal account, which you must be 18 years of age to use their services according to their user agreement.
5.
by AaronI 14y ago
...or, they just didn't register. Charities with an income less than £5000/yr do not have to register, but still maintain their charitable status.
6.
by AaronI 14y ago
Did you read the post? It's counting those who have visited the G+ stream or used the mobile app.
7.
by AaronI 14y ago
I haven't met any fellow USians that _constantly_ do this. Then again, I guess that's the problem with making wide generalizations about an entire group of people.
8.
by AaronI 15y ago
A point which is based on a flawed assumption. Public posts don't necessarily correlate with private posts.
9.
by AaronI 15y ago
Agreed. It's essentially design by committee, which may work well when there's only a handful of you, but consensus of several individuals is difficult to reach, and the obvious or safe choice is accepted with little insight or vision. Comm
10.
by AaronI 15y ago
Facebook does this as well if it believes you're creating multiple accounts.
11.
by AaronI 15y ago
They can pass an act designated as "private law" (aka slip laws), which can apply to specific individuals and afford relief from another law or grant benefits/powers that are not available under the general law. So Congress actually does ha
12.
by AaronI 15y ago
It's sarcastic in intent. Trying to condemn an idiom that is obviously logical nonsense misses the point. When I say "I could care less", it could be interpreted instead, "as if there were anything else I care less about."
13.
by AaronI 16y ago
I was under the impression it had more to do with Facebook's policy of requiring real names. Most Japanese users do not use their real identities online.
14.
by AaronI 16y ago
I served in the Navy as a Legalman (LN), and while I don't know the specifics of this case, military justice differs from civilian justice in quite a few ways. To begin with, a trial is not needed for confinement, nor for certain types of p
15.
by AaronI 16y ago
Gates, as SecDef, has been pushing for many of those changes since he took office in 2006. There's quite a bit to give Obama credit for, but Gates as SecDef is not one of them.
16.
by AaronI 16y ago
Sony's WebTV was a set-top box (Phillips produced them as well) for WebTV Networks, Inc. Microsoft later bought WebTV Networks in '98.
17.
by AaronI 16y ago
The issue most likely is not the weapons themselves, but who controls them. A stockpile of weapons are only dangerous in the "wrong" hands. If Iran is being bullied, as you put it, then it's not just by the U.S. Quite a few other countries
18.
by AaronI 16y ago
Worked fine for me as well (using Chrome). I was able to get 591 out of 622 contacts, assuming those individuals changed their privacy settings to hide their email..
19.
by AaronI 17y ago
Your argument that because you're "blunt" entitles you to behave like a 5 year old, is utter bullshit. There is something called tact. If you want people to help you, then perhaps try showing some. The dude had a lot more patience than supp