ATechGuy

4 ms·

1.
by ATechGuy 6mo ago
This is very useful. Thanks for sharing!
2.
Ask HN: The new wave of AI agent sandboxes?
12 points by ATechGuy 6mo ago|5 comments
3.
by ATechGuy 6mo ago
+1
4.
by ATechGuy 6mo ago
You built https://github.com/FootprintAI/Containarium for this purpose?
5.
Ask HN: The new wave of AI agent sandboxes?
3 points by ATechGuy 7mo ago|0 comments
6.
Ask HN: Is anyone tracking AI traffic to their site? Should we care?
2 points by ATechGuy 7mo ago|2 comments
7.
Ask HN: Why) are you using AI to browse the web?
2 points by ATechGuy 7mo ago|4 comments
8.
by ATechGuy 7mo ago
TBH, this looks like an LLM-assisted response.
9.
by ATechGuy 7mo ago
+1. It is confusing.
10.
by ATechGuy 7mo ago
And how are you going to define what ocaps/flows are needed when agent behavior is not defined?
11.
Ask HN: (Why) are you using AI to browse the web?
1 points by ATechGuy 7mo ago|2 comments
12.
by ATechGuy 7mo ago
Interesting. I'd appreciate an example. Thanks!
13.
by ATechGuy 7mo ago
Would love to see performance numbers with nested virtualization, particularly that of IO-bound workloads.
14.
by ATechGuy 7mo ago
> a website can expose functions like searchProducts(query, filters) or orderPrints(copies, page_size) with full parameter schemas How would this not create backend load and abuse?
15.
by ATechGuy 7mo ago
That's a good start I'd say, but I agree with you that detection is not trivial. I wonder if there's enough value in distinguishing between AI agents (with full browser) and humans. What use cases would it enable?
16.
by ATechGuy 7mo ago
Yes, but how can you tell if it was an agent with full browser?
17.
Google Chrome ships WebMCP, turning every website into a tool for AI agents(venturebeat.com)
9 points by ATechGuy 7mo ago|2 comments
18.
by ATechGuy 7mo ago
Thanks for your insights! QQ: does uxwizz also show AI agents visiting websites? have you seen traffic from AI agents?
19.
Ask HN: If agentic AI is the future, why is every startup shipping a dashboard?
1 points by ATechGuy 7mo ago|8 comments
20.
In 2024, 51% of online activity came from bots(euractiv.com)
3 points by ATechGuy 7mo ago|0 comments
21.
by ATechGuy 7mo ago
I agree. However, how to define these permissions when agent behavior is undefined?
22.
by ATechGuy 8mo ago
I understand the concern. However, you can customize the profile (e.g., allowlist) to only allow network access to required domains. Also, looks like your sandboxing solution is Docker based, which uses VMs on a Mac machine, but will not us
23.
by ATechGuy 8mo ago
That's right. But they (E2B) rely on the underneath Cloud infra to achieve high scalability. Personally, I'm still not sure about the value they add on top of Cloud hosted VMs. GCP/AWS already offer huge discounts to startups
24.
by ATechGuy 8mo ago
To the commenters here: thanks for correcting me! So AWS is losing AI sandboxing market to GCP due to high cold start times of EC2...very interesting!
25.
by ATechGuy 8mo ago
You can customize curr_dir_access_profile.sb to block access to network/fs/etc. Why is this not enough?
26.
by ATechGuy 8mo ago
sandbox-exec -f curr_dir_access_profile.sb markdownlint
27.
by ATechGuy 8mo ago
Curious to know what made you DIY this?
28.
by ATechGuy 8mo ago
These are all wrappers around VMs. You could DIY these easily by using EC2/serverless/GCP SDKs.
29.
by ATechGuy 8mo ago
> we offer secure cloud VMs that scale up to 100k concurrent instances or more. High scalability and VM isolation is what the Cloud (GCP/AWS, that E2B runs on) offers.
30.
by ATechGuy 8mo ago
> I feel more in control of what's being exposed and how Makes complete sense. Thanks for your insights!

More ›