ADD-SP

6 ms·

1.
Dive into FrontierHarness Eval: Claude Code cost 5.6× for the same pass rate(runta.com)
6 points by ADD-SP 10d ago|3 comments
2.
by ADD-SP 16d ago
Codex is the best harness to me because of its GUI and subscription.
3.
by ADD-SP 2y ago
Totally agreed, this is also what I want to say.
4.
by ADD-SP 2y ago
This crate is not an alternative of the serde_json, it only do the validation. Currently, there is no other crates do the sames validation works on JSON, so I have to parse the dataset by a common JSON parser (sede_json) and do the same val
5.
by ADD-SP 2y ago
Haha, looks like the GitHub Copilot is not good at marketing, I have made it more marketable. Thanks for your pointing out!
6.
by ADD-SP 2y ago
Makes sense, numbers added.
7.
by ADD-SP 2y ago
Great to see this article, I totally agreed with the view that rejecting any invalid case by designing the right data structure. Unfortunately, it is hard to achieve it in practice and people even don't realize this, JSON Object is a g
8.
by ADD-SP 2y ago
Perhaps checking a service's behavior in response to such JSON is high on the security researcher's list of things to do that are high priority and simple. "( – ⌓ – )
9.
by ADD-SP 2y ago
The JSON RFC ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8259#page-6 ) doesn't require the unique entry name, and also the fact is that many parser uses the last-win strategy like serde_json. For human, this is
10.
Show HN: JSON-Threat-Protection Rust High-Performance Crate(github.com)
34 points by ADD-SP 2y ago|19 comments
11.
Show HN: Ngx_waf – Open source, Handy, High performance Nginx firewall module(github.com)
31 points by ADD-SP 5y ago|0 comments