7to2

8 ms·

1.
by 7to2 3y ago
Does this mean we will be able to embed private keys and API keys in deliverables? (i.e. to cryptographicaly sign artifacts, APIs tokens, and other niceties). Sucks that DRM and user rights violations is about to get much much worse.
2.
by 7to2 3y ago
They stopped?
3.
by 7to2 3y ago
Trust on first use is absolutely a valid use of PGP signatures that is being used in many real world systems (ask me how I know). You finding that PGP isn't being used they way you think it should does not justify removing it without p
4.
by 7to2 3y ago
That quote doesn't make any sense even if we stopped at the first part. I PGP-sign my packages and my key is not on any public key server. It's on my website. This reasoning lacks rigor and seems to only serve as an excuse to remo
5.
by 7to2 3y ago
Doesn't 5G share some of the frequencies used by normal wifi? IIRC devices implementing one standard even cooperate with devices implementing the other to coordinate frequency use.
6.
by 7to2 3y ago
Where did you go to? I'm in a similar boat.
7.
by 7to2 3y ago
ARM offers the same possibility.. in exchange for a fee and a stack of NDAs. Competition and openness is how we should deal with this disease.
8.
by 7to2 3y ago
> You are in an echo-chamber. Doesn't matter. An echo-chamber that your target demographic frequents can be just as damaging to your overall reputation if not more. Source: Someone currently working in government IT procurement who
9.
by 7to2 3y ago
That's why I'm rooting for riskv processors, so that we can get the equivalent of reproducible openSSL binaries. US chips that are found to be irreproducable can be rightfully ignored.
10.
by 7to2 3y ago
Exactly. Even if we assumed for the sake of argument that wifi cards have complete access to the system, that in and of itself does not excuse CPU vendors to broaden the attack surface and prevent owners from narrowing it back down. I can&#
11.
by 7to2 3y ago
> [ ] Always choose this option.
12.
by 7to2 3y ago
It's not that they don't understand it, it's that they don't want the average user to have a convenient way to control this setting. Prompting the user for permission would give the user a very convenient way to keep it
13.
by 7to2 3y ago
> But closer inspection showed that its use was to get user's IP address for better fingerprinting. Maybe that's why it fell to the wayside: scripts are no longer allowed to get the local IP address (taking with it the most use
14.
by 7to2 3y ago
> All of the llama derivatives are tainted by Meta's license, which makes commercial use illegal and even personal use dubious. This is not true if you never agreed to Meta's license. If you haven't, you either can't
15.
by 7to2 3y ago
> They’re research use only, no commercial use allowed. if you agreed to Facebook's contract. If you haven't, it's either public domain or copyright infringement.
16.
by 7to2 4y ago
What wiki?
17.
by 7to2 4y ago
So much this. I was lied to and strung along for weeks by Huawei support about a missing feature that should have been in their personal 4G dongles. Guess who blacklisted all Huawei gear in the last company I worked at. Guess who's now
18.
by 7to2 4y ago
If we agreed with your premise that AI is a great filter and that this filter can somehow be contained by a small group, then I guess what it boils down to is two choices: 1. either lock everything down and accept the control of a small una
19.
by 7to2 4y ago
That's what brand recognition and brand loyalty (and the money they generate) allows you to do. This is not necessarily a bad thing since it forces other competitors - who like to artificially limit their products - to actually get of
20.
by 7to2 4y ago
Do you know what the WPEs are for llama?
21.
by 7to2 4y ago
Hello AWS China regions. Both of them are completely independent from AWS.
22.
by 7to2 4y ago
Easy! Article 44 of the GPDR explicitly prohibits the transfer of private information outside the conditions of the regulation. The cloud act requires the transfer of the private information without consideration to anything but US laws. GP
23.
by 7to2 4y ago
This isn't theft by any common definition. End of argument. Now you could try to argue that it's copyright infringement but there are many solid arguments as to why these model weights don't meet the threshold of copyrightabi
24.
by 7to2 4y ago
> You would miss out on trying one of the most significant innovations in a decade because of a phone number? Yes. It's a mater of principle.
25.
by 7to2 4y ago
I'm in the same boat. I'm not going to give away my phone number to some random company to try out this thing. A big Thank You to OP and whoever set this up. Edit: Not working for me. Perhaps the service is being squeezed to death
26.
by 7to2 4y ago
As a customer, that's not my problem.
27.
by 7to2 4y ago
I think society will eventually be forced to adopt the broker model often featured in dystopian media. People will no longer trust big corporations and instead refer to local fixers and information brokers to get the information they need (
28.
by 7to2 4y ago
I desperately miss static typing.
29.
by 7to2 4y ago
How substantial is Go's standard library compared to Python's? I know Go has support for what I would consider to be the bare minimum for what modern standard libraries must provide (http, crypto, time), but what about support of
30.
by 7to2 4y ago
A beautiful illustration of the streisand effect I see. I had no idea this was a thing.

More ›