6ix8igth

6 ms·

1.
by 6ix8igth 2y ago
You keep fixating on one half of my point (this law shouldn't exist) while completely ignoring and not addressing the rational (it does basically nothing to help children at great cost to your rights). In no way am I endorsing generati
2.
by 6ix8igth 2y ago
You don't feel impeded right now, but let enough stupid stuff like this through and you'll slowly drip feed your rights away. I explained in my post above why this is bad - if you make it a crime to do a simple thing, it becomes
3.
by 6ix8igth 2y ago
Laws like this impede everyone while providing little tangible benefit for actual children. It's silly to imply that generating an image with a model hurts anyone. In general I don't like legislation that tries to criminalize abs
4.
by 6ix8igth 2y ago
It's possible for the model to take disparate concepts and put them together. E.g. you can train a LORA to teach stable diffusion what a cowboy hat it is, then ask for Dracula in a cowboy hat.that probably doesn't exist in it&#x27
5.
by 6ix8igth 2y ago
One can smoke and have a condition that is not caused by smoking, just like one can avoid exercising and have a condition that is not caused by insufficient exercise. You can't compile a list of facts about a person's life and use
6.
by 6ix8igth 2y ago
How do you delineate between conditions that are "lifestyle driven" and not? When you develop a problem with your body it doesn't come with a receipt listing the cause. I've personally had postural issues that were for m