5678909787

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by 5678909787 4y ago

   The rule is just that it's not a crime to leave a child in that location. It doesn't legally affect parental responsibility or anything else outside of criminal law. I'm 100% in favour of unrestricted abortions up to birth. B
2. 2.▲
   by 5678909787 4y ago

   How could they possibly enforce that? Is there any government in the world that's currently able to enforce such laws?
3. 3.▲
   by 5678909787 4y ago

   They are not imposing restrictions on themselves. Anyone who doesn't want an abortion can just not have an abortion. They are imposing restrictions on other people. Being a majority doesn't give you the right to impose restriction
4. 4.▲
   by 5678909787 4y ago

   Safe haven laws don't do that. They just provide an exception to child abandonment laws. They don't directly affect parental responsibility. If a child has two parents and one of them drops the child of at a safe haven location an
5. 5.▲
   by 5678909787 4y ago

   That makes no sense at all. People can have consensual sex without wanting a child and they can change their mind about wanting a child after having consensual sex. I'm curious if you apply the same argument when the mother wants a chi
6. 6.▲
   by 5678909787 4y ago

   I don’t think any person should mandate any person what to do with their body. This would not have been any less wrong if it was done entirely by women. Women don't have any more right to control other women's bodies than men do.