55pts

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by 55pts 14y ago

   Or Erlang supervision trees.
2. 2.▲
   by 55pts 14y ago

   You're right. I tried to remove it, but I can't edit the comment anymore.
3. 3.▲
   by 55pts 14y ago

   Here's my guess: Synacor. Took me only a few minutes of googling.
4. 4.▲
   by 55pts 14y ago

   Very cool project, thanks for open sourcing it. I was looking for this type of library this week and found medusa and aymcms. Does it handle images? How about multiple sites/subdomains?
5. 5.▲
   by 55pts 14y ago

   Antirez, I have a great deal of respect for your work, but calling somebody else's work "garbage" is not cool. Constructive criticism in order to make the benchmark more relevant would've been more helpful.
6. 6.▲
   by 55pts 14y ago

   Well said. Functional features do not a functional language make.
7. 7.▲
   by 55pts 14y ago

   I like ruby but please, do not call it a functional language. Its not even remotely close.
8. 8.▲
   by 55pts 14y ago

   Both. Learn ruby and rails.
9. 9.▲
   by 55pts 15y ago

   why is this even on the front page? Without context the presentation is pretty much useless. If you are interested in app development with coffeescript just search github for titanium + coffeescript and you'll get lots of cool templates and
10. 10.▲
    by 55pts 15y ago

    I would've been much more impressed had it not been post hoc rationalization. Of course it's obvious after the fact.
11. 11.▲
    Apes, Words and People(creation.mobi)

    2 points by 55pts 15y ago|0 comments