4ugSWklu

11 ms·

1.
by 4ugSWklu 1y ago
If you read very carefully, you'll see that the word "more" is key in that sentence.
2.
by 4ugSWklu 1y ago
You sir have just won the internet!
3.
by 4ugSWklu 1y ago
I hope that someone gets a photo of Crump’s Mouse one day.
4.
by 4ugSWklu 2y ago
Did it catch them baconing? If so, at what time? (ง ͠° ͜ʖ ͡°)ง
5.
by 4ugSWklu 2y ago
Not great. Very few chippies.
6.
by 4ugSWklu 2y ago
Why is that disappointing? Are charities and NHS trusts that help trans people above the law?
7.
by 4ugSWklu 3y ago
You can get iodised salt in Norway in basically any grocery store. Look for “salt med jod”.
8.
by 4ugSWklu 3y ago
I think in a perfect world that would be great. Unfortunately, it’s difficult to see how a system like that could ever be implemented within our lifetimes. I personally think Baseline is a good pragmatic approach. It includes only known med
9.
by 4ugSWklu 3y ago
I’m unsure what you’re saying here, can you clarify? Is it that Baseline seems overly bureaucratic and will be ineffective, or that people should not support any CSAM lists at all?
10.
by 4ugSWklu 3y ago
“To be included in the Baseline list, child abuse images and videos must be recognized as such by our specialist network of investigators, and meet specific criteria in terms of the severity of the image content, for example those believed
11.
by 4ugSWklu 3y ago
This does already exist somewhat as the INTERPOL Baseline list - https://www.interpol.int/Crimes/Crimes-against-children/Bloc... Does this meet your threshold?