Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
4ntonius8lock
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
White Hat SEO Is Mostly a Fantasy – Those Who Rank Have Shades of Grey
(nicolasgorden.com)
2 points
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
|
1 comments
2.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
You are thinking in the realm of theory. None of that works in the realm of reality. Creating a fake ID = super illegal. Credit cards: prepaid can be detected and blocked, same as the privacy.com ones - especially when the credit card is be
3.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
This works. And I do it. Too many unhinged people out there. Here in the US, I've found things in restaurants a couple of times and pointed it to the staff. It clears the liability for all involved, since no one can claim that the staf
4.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
The funny thing is, the most up voted comments on this topic don't even seem to be about the FA. They are mostly just 'generic advertising is bad comment/anecdote related to the title'. Another idea I had after reading t
5.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
Having read the article, it seems they are concluding a causality that isn't necessarily there. The whole study is based on: there's a correlation between advertising spend per capita and life satisfaction between countries in Eur
6.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
> Do you really want to spend your time writing to Congress to have them pass a law making smoking a protected class? No, but I do like writing about restricting employers ability to discriminate employees based on their off-the clock pe
7.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
I agree with healthcare insurance being changed. I will say, just because it costs them more money doesn't mean they should legally be able to act on that. Many times someone from a certain religion might cost an employer more than som
8.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
You're also confusing something: that plenty of legal things are not socially tolerated. If a company came out saying 'sorry, we don't hire feminists'... they might... face consequences. Even if that is legal. Right now
9.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
Great. Personally, I've changed my mind on some very serious topics: death penalty, addiction, government regulations, capitalism, etc. In each case, it took someone patiently going over points to help me see better. It takes time for
10.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
I clicked through. Source material is about 200 pages. Linking to a news article is one thing. Linking to basically a book, without so much as saying why the book is good, is another. I'm not relying solely on what the OP says. But I&#
11.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
I clicked through. Source material is about 200 pages. Linking to a news article is one thing. Linking to basically a book, without so much as saying why the book is good, is another. I didn't say it was bad. Just asked the OP, why sub
12.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
There's over 100 pages of material here. Why has this been submitted? What's interesting in it? These type of submissions attract the worst commentators; people who will talk about the topic based on what they can infer from a tit
13.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
Satire definition: "the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues." From Wikipedia: "
14.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
Good satire is entertaining. It does not help build bridges of communication between people who think differently. That's why I think it's looked down upon here. You are right on the /. point. :)
15.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
It has to do with the concept of government transparency. In the US, from what I understand, the founders of the country feared secret courts issuing secret sentences for secret reasons. So the idea is that almost all government stuff is pu
16.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
I didn't read it. But for some of us, silly inane comments that don't add to the conversation can detract from it. If that's what you are looking for, may I suggest reddit? On there, an article is posted and you'll have
17.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
The FA we are talking about is related to the completion of the construction of the first Fusion reactor by the end of this year. Also, fusion has only really been seriously considered AFAIK since the 70s (yes theoretical research happened
18.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
I said the greater freedom in America helped it win the cold war. Of course it is more nuanced than that. But that can literally be applied to everything and anything ever said - if someone said being outside jail is good or not being addic
19.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
Yeah, that's not a concrete example of the SPECIFIC cutting edge area of AI that china dominates development of. At least I couldn't find it. I gave one for the US. I've yet to receive one for China. All I've seen is: &q
20.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
If ... if ... if ... might 3 ifs and one might. Let's see: If my grandmother was male and if she was catholic, she might be the pope. I only had to use two ifs to get to that one. I'm really not sure what your point is. Are you se
21.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
Because it hasn't historically worked that way. This isn't a first to market huge advantage. Developing the plants is slow (many years) and the lag between super powers in cracking tech is generally only a couple of years (see spa
22.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
Wind and solar don't deal with peak energy use. See Germany vs France as an example.
23.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
I'm curious, when you say AI, what do you mean? To me AI is machine learning. And the US is leading in that area, the forefront of which seems to be self driving technology. Are there specific examples of cutting edge machine learning
24.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
I hope they succeed. We desperately need to adopt nuclear energy world wide. The success of such a project would pressure western governments into adopting the technology to stay competitive. Especially when the cost of a kilowatt hour plum
25.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
I think furthermore, not only is it fearmongering, it's actually wrong. What the article calls AI is just machine learning. And America leads the way on this when it comes to cutting edge. Look at self driving cars. It seems the articl
26.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
I'd say there's even a third option, the causality runs back AND forth (both good thoughts can lead to good outcomes as well as bad outcomes can lead to bad thoughts and vice a versa) Even in this third option there exist an infin
27.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
I'm not afraid of being pessimistic. I read the article title and wanted to see how accurate it was. If it was accurate, it would cause me, like a rational creature, to question my tendencies. I have list of pros and cons for all my pr
28.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
When I read the tile and skimmed through the article, I thought: define pessimism. I mean, I consider myself pessimistic, but what do THEY who designed the study consider pessimistic. I tend to find the fault in things, see how they are wro
29.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
Amazing, thanks for sharing. Can I ask why you think SK is putting such a prominent figure in jail over this? I mean this in the sense that, first you guys are doing the right thing and second I think here in the US we have a terrible track
30.
▲
by
4ntonius8lock
7y ago
Actually with ebay I can more easily trust. Because they don't co-mingle, I know that someone with 100,000 positive reviews on ebay is unlikely to sell a counterfeit. With amazon I don't have that trust, since even if the seller i
More ›