481092

6 ms·

1.
by 481092 7y ago
His implementation may be new but the idea of interfacing with content in a 3D manner isn't. I remember trying out a 3D desktop program around 2003 and if I recall correctly, it came with a game demo disc.
2.
by 481092 7y ago
Which place in it was this? I mean, there's just so many, would be good to know so I can avoid it.
3.
by 481092 7y ago
You've never served, have you? The military is highly influential, especially among family, in influencing political views. Not to mention social media which gives us all a pen as well as a sword, proverbially. Either way, if you compl
4.
by 481092 7y ago
>when in fact it's just the act of choosing the side that's winning In a fairly benign way, maybe. But if you want to take the moral high ground then you should be careful not to steer people, friends and family especially, int
5.
by 481092 7y ago
There were conservatives who cared then. But yeah, traditional media tends to be more liberal so you heard about it more this time. I guess that's the tradeoff we have. In America, media tends to bias towards liberalism as we know it w
6.
by 481092 7y ago
Many sites don't accept Google Voice or VOIP numbers unfortunately. Or fortunately, depending, as it'd be easier to use GV for text spamming.
7.
by 481092 7y ago
Is this the common view? I always saw "fittest" as that which is more fit for a niche regardless of what power trait was implemented. I mentioned this elsewhere in this [1] comment, being surprised that someone assumed "fit&q
8.
by 481092 7y ago
What do they do with it once "used"? I know, search it, but it's a morbid topic I'd rather read no more about than possible.
9.
by 481092 7y ago
Those strawberries were your aunt before she was born. Did you know strawberries and other foods go into producing humans? And when we die we, if given a natural death, we can go into producing foods again? It's always been that way. I
10.
by 481092 7y ago
Does it? Maybe on the micro but at the classical macro level, it's pretty deterministic. Why not both? And in some beautiful Taoist fashion, perhaps they're mutually complementary, both opposites need to exist for reality to exist
11.
by 481092 7y ago
Out of all the crises society has ever faced, you're talking about one of the most peaceful times in mankind. This is why people are getting annoyed at youtube's recommendations and part of the problem. People like you and Peterso
12.
by 481092 7y ago
They should make youtube great again. It used to be that I could watch 911 videos on the anniversary and there'd be real heart-felt personal videos from actual people involved and now most of that's been censored by dramatic consp
13.
by 481092 7y ago
You could say the same of knowledge also as it is a power and one applied and accrued by relationship; by what material one reads, by whom and from which source it is linked from and to. Academics of various groups tend to have their own so
14.
by 481092 7y ago
Hulu has some educational documentaries as well as Netflix. There's also curiositystream if you want all docs and even some on youtube. There's tons of educational streaming online, it's about all I watch.
15.
by 481092 7y ago
>The unifying principle of conservatism is: survival of the fittest This isn't just a principle of a party but a natural law. This is displayed in liberal politics also. Life is a fight using powers as a utility, hard and soft power
16.
by 481092 7y ago
They host and indirectly disseminate media, just like a news network. Do you expect Fox or CNN to host views they don't find acceptable? If we're going to accept that biased media is legal (news networks) then biased media is lega
17.
by 481092 7y ago
Do you complain when liberal writers don't get hosted on Fox News? Or when liberal guests don't get as much air time as conservatives? Do you want congress to clamp down and make all sides get equal air time and newspaper time? Th
18.
by 481092 7y ago
"Absolute free speech" is like anarchism. I've yet to meet someone who fully practices them both yet they will preach it and condemn others with their self-righteous hypocrisy. Would you want me to come up to your kid and cus
19.
by 481092 7y ago
You'll never have a search engine without bias. A search engine's job is just that, to bias various data, not soak up any and all data on the internet. That's why humans or anyone or anything in this universe is biased, becau
20.
by 481092 7y ago
Did Gödel even prove step 1?. In Gödel's argument, it's relying on very arbitrary definitions of what many have defined as a god and that their god is "great". OP defined what is "great" to him, it's not n
21.
by 481092 7y ago
> A clown is not "that for which no greater horror can be conceived" I don't know, some people are really scared of clowns. Also as a reminder, your "proof" is something made up throughout history along with thou
22.
by 481092 7y ago
I read that and assumed there'd be a followup investigation of attempted mass murder but nothing. Was justice served, or even half-heartedly attempted and the article didn't mention it? The story lacks or justice lacks, hopefully
23.
by 481092 7y ago
So you're going to try to silence, or censor, a company into not choosing a more relevant algorithm? Their original algo changed and it "censored" more relevant content. I had a few videos on youtube giving my own personal ex
24.
by 481092 7y ago
If you watch the linked video, it seems the guy found them because youtube's algorithm suggested other conspiracy videos instead of more 9/11 videos like he was watching. Other people probably have more relevant 9/11 videos b
25.
by 481092 7y ago
It's not censoring, just changing the algorithm according to relevance. You could argue that other people were censored first so that youtube would suggest FE theory videos before their own which may have been more relevant. But it see
26.
by 481092 7y ago
So much for intellectual honesty on this site. New user and I thought this was something praised here. The hypocrisy of upvoting the parent because they're against information propagators being linked to an administration while ignorin
27.
by 481092 7y ago
Is that wrong? Maybe we should do something about Fox and Breitbart's link to the current administration then.
28.
by 481092 7y ago
I think of it like inventing. It's not completely analogous but do you want to learn to invent something? No, right? Because you think of something to invent first and then get to learning how to create it. I've heard it's ea
29.
by 481092 7y ago
This reminds me of Robert Sapolsky's lectures, brilliant and easy to find on youtube, where he mentions the most optimal or successful form of communication between parties where you may have miscommunication or misunderstanding is gen
30.
by 481092 7y ago
I'm of the philosophy that love is a power.

More ›