2lup382_

6 ms·

1.
by 2lup382_ 2mo ago
> Therein is the great misunderstanding , the GPL was never written for 'companies' , it was and still is for the User. I didn't say it was, but what it was written for and what it became since writing software has changed
2.
by 2lup382_ 2mo ago
> For me it's either AGPLv3 or all rights reserved. I'm trending towards the latter now. Then for you it was never about freedom and community, which were the two major goals the Free Software movement were founded on, it was a
3.
by 2lup382_ 2mo ago
> used to have so much more leverage back then And maybe that was required back then, and/or maybe it ended up being bad strategy in the long term. Leverage only gets you so far, especially in community and relationships. > Just
4.
by 2lup382_ 2mo ago
I think GPL and copyleft in general is getting less and less relevant as time goes on. Looking at GPL specifically it relies on scarcity. The reason companies would agree to the terms of the GPL in the 1980s, 90s, and even 00s was if you wa
5.
by 2lup382_ 1y ago
I just ate bacon now my fingers are greasy as i type this Line 1 5 / 5 i(1) just(1) ate(1) bacon(2) Line 2 7 / 7 now(1) my(1) fingers(2) are(1) greasy(2) Line 3 5 / 5 as(1) i(1) type(2) this(1) I might have greasy fingers but
6.
by 2lup382_ 1y ago
for it to align with the case the case would need to be as thick as the camera bump thus negating the entire point of a thin phone while introducing all the problems of a thin phone.
7.
by 2lup382_ 1y ago
Their point still stands. A lot of us strive to NOT be in our cars, offices, or schools for extended periods.
8.
by 2lup382_ 1y ago
Why make a worse product for a problem that can be solved by carrying your phone a different way, or not having your phone on you for a moment?