2099miles

6 ms·

1.
by 2099miles 1y ago
I feel like this is one of the most obvious takes out there but simultaneously parents are crazily unaware of it. Parents need to be more aware of ai companions and Roblox and how bad they are.
2.
by 2099miles 1y ago
Character ai is the one I heard about most.
3.
by 2099miles 1y ago
^ Exactly Ads are 100% fine I just want the option to pay to avoid them. Like black mirror I think had an episode or some movie had it where you watch an ad instead of paying for a bus ticket and that’s totally fine, cuz right now there is
4.
by 2099miles 1y ago
^
5.
by 2099miles 1y ago
The issue I have with this article is that I can ask it “generate me a picture of tomb raider and pikachu on a couch” and it does it. This article makes it seems like it’s skirting the guardrails, dude OpenAI took them off, it’s out in the
6.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Psh, the companies are freely giving up the data. It is unmentioned where the villagers got the carrot initially, maybe they also stole it from the library or promised their users the carrot would not be eaten. Lol
7.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Great post
8.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Continued rant : It’s kinda like a ruler. If you measure workers so that one’s doing 10x less/worse output than the average that’s good. If you compare workers down to the .01% difference in output that’s stupid and inhumane.
9.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Tbh this isn’t that crazy. If you hire someone to do their job outputting 10 items per hour and that number is reasonable because a bunch of other workers you hired for the same job are doing it and 1 guy hits 1 per hour then that guys shou
10.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Peak capitalism would have the employees holding their own value and not being crushed in trash power dynamics to allow this kind of stuff. Capitalism is about nonviolent voluntary exchanges between two parties, when one party has a power d
11.
by 2099miles 2y ago
The words thinking and reasoning used here are imprecise. It’s just generating text like always. If the text is after “ai-thoughts:” then it’s “thinking” and if it’s after “ai-response” then it’s “responding” not “thinking” but it is always
12.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Your comment from earlier wasn’t as easy to digest as this one. I don’t think that person copied you at all.
13.
by 2099miles 2y ago
How is it related to TD1 was it the inspiration for the yellow king and carcosa?
14.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Now this is solid, like an ai enhanced Evernote, but for organization, not generation/creation.
15.
by 2099miles 2y ago
This is so interesting that people want this. This is beyond the guy saying “people don’t like making music so we made ai so it’s easier and faster to just prompt it to make music” . Like in my experience the best part of d&d is the dun
16.
by 2099miles 2y ago
I hate this and came to same conclusion. Here I thought I was going to get some third party tested results of popular brands as a public service. Smh
17.
by 2099miles 2y ago
TLDR: ai can be helpful, anyone who doesn’t use it hasn’t realized it’s helpful, SWE’s who disagree “are frankly not gonna make it” Review: great fun story, I agree with the first part of the take and I like the post and I like some ai tool
18.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Agreed, but also I’d like some article or something explaining its relation to iq and how the claim that it increases it came about
19.
by 2099miles 2y ago
I don’t get this comment. Double is common hyperbole, but like do you think tiktok habits don’t degrade other productivity? It’s a known phenomenon that smartphones kill boredom and boredom promotes things like sleeping and productivity.
20.
by 2099miles 2y ago
This was an interesting post. Thanks for making me question if sarcasm is actually a bad thing. I don’t agree off the bat but I’ve never seriously considered it.
21.
by 2099miles 2y ago
When I read that part I also thought they were just trying to pwn the libs, but the rest of the article was so good, and what they said isn’t inaccurate, so now I think I was just projecting that. Not being super invested and having it just
22.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Especially in cars, especially in simple controls, touch screens are great for low screen real estate but cars are one of the dumbest places for them since there is so much real estate and so little need for a screen
23.
by 2099miles 2y ago
This is just a step away from UBI. I appreciate the universal approach but prefer universal solution instead of only to “housing” offering public housing to people who can afford and choose to live in higher quality is a fake universal solu
24.
by 2099miles 2y ago
That’s trash. I’ll delete yelp over that, bad customer or dev relations sucks.
25.
by 2099miles 2y ago
New research: no
26.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Unintuitive LLM only rag?
27.
by 2099miles 2y ago
As a concept infinite context will not be discovered. We can spin up huge models with large contexts that cost more but even 1M context is 1 expensive and 2 not 3trillion(size of some datasets) Rag is not bad attention, rag is the user not
28.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Yeah I say cost is the biggest thing. Why doesn’t everyone just use GPT 4 for everything or Gemini ultra + RAG with all documents in the rag system with the best embedding model Among other things because it’s way too expensive and narrowin
29.
by 2099miles 2y ago
I mean you can’t build rag into a model, it’s part of a system or application. You wouldn’t say a steering wheel is built into an engine. People just build cars with engines.
30.
by 2099miles 2y ago
Great take, insightful. Highly recommend.

More ›