1718627440

4 ms·

1.
by 1718627440 9d ago
> Even DOS didn't really have libraries, you had peripherals mapped to memory at certain addresses, And linked libraries are interfaces mapped into memory at certain names. I think that's an awesome improvement.
2.
by 1718627440 9d ago
That's why I like the "managed" model Debian uses. Programs are enforced to comply to the OS standards. If they don't, they either get changed by the Debian maintainers or just not included into the distribution. That
3.
by 1718627440 9d ago
There is travic.app, which uses realtime data, if available.
4.
by 1718627440 9d ago
You need hundreds of them to make an orchestra and every big city want's an orchestra to be competitive.
5.
by 1718627440 13d ago
The absence of "needing to manage the index" is what breaks my workflow.
6.
by 1718627440 14d ago
Because it interferes with my workflow. If there are non-committed changes when I want to do something else, they do represent actions I want to do. I don't just have random uncommitted changes there. Setting --autosquash as default
7.
by 1718627440 14d ago
The actual rules are different per-country, but the trend is the same. In Germany you aren't allowed to have crossings for lines permitted for over 160km/h. Also the former national railway company decided to not build new cross
8.
by 1718627440 14d ago
> Along with the appropriate git stash and git stash pops If you don't want to do that, you can tell git to do it automatically too? I actually thought I would like that, so I used it for a week. I did not like it at all. > But
9.
by 1718627440 14d ago
I do, but I don't really get it, because you did learn the jj command. I mean you could have learned jj first, I would understand that, but I presume that is not the case.
10.
by 1718627440 14d ago
> How many of those do you need? How many do I want? > How do find the correct arguments How do you find the correct arguments for jj? > and git checkouts to do before? Why would I do a checkout before? I don't want to modify
11.
by 1718627440 14d ago
git rebase --onto --rebase-merges ?
12.
by 1718627440 14d ago
Can't you run this under a different user or in the same, but with another instance of the desktop server?
13.
by 1718627440 14d ago
Governments also codify into law that everything X standardizes is automatically a regulation for other standard bodies. Road and building standards work that way: they are just standards issued by a random association and the government h
14.
by 1718627440 14d ago
Yeah, but before I am proficient in the more elaborate stuff, there is no reason to use emacs, so I never do it. And there is no tutorial for this.
15.
by 1718627440 14d ago
> I don’t like to think about how I’d do that with git. git -c sequence.editor="sed -i '1ip oldercommit'" rebase -i @~ Git using standard UNIX tools for these things instead of a specialized syntax, means I ca
16.
by 1718627440 14d ago
Thanks, that's even better than accessing old.reddit.com!
17.
by 1718627440 14d ago
> with a Google Account that isn't tied to anything else. How can I get this wonderful thing?
18.
by 1718627440 14d ago
> - shuffling commits around with squash, split, and rebase is much better than git’s interactive rebase Can you explain this to me? I feel like Git is pretty easy there. - select oldest commit to modify - move the commits aro
19.
by 1718627440 14d ago
I mean that's what I do in Git as well, I just don't do it by storing conflicts, but by not triggering them/ignoring them.
20.
by 1718627440 14d ago
I always wanted to learn emacs, but I never do, because while I don't know it using it doesn't pay off. I did the tutorial at some point (I mean great that it exists) and now I can move around and close the editor, but that'
21.
by 1718627440 15d ago
All people do, only few resort to fraud. If you start with that argument, you can rationalize any crime.
22.
by 1718627440 15d ago
Which is not a workaround, but giving in. And it gets increasingly difficult to create an account without giving them personal data.
23.
by 1718627440 15d ago
To what value do I need to set the cookie?
24.
by 1718627440 15d ago
Right is a moral category, not a legal one.
25.
by 1718627440 15d ago
If you don't agree on the laws in your country, you need to figure that out civilized instead of hurting third-parties.
26.
by 1718627440 15d ago
But if you applied already, it's currently unknown whether you have a valid visa or not.
27.
by 1718627440 15d ago
It's has been renamed to 'Trump' now.
28.
by 1718627440 15d ago
Yeah, that's what always happens. By "tightening" the law, you only hurt the law-abiding citizens.
29.
by 1718627440 15d ago
How is damage to a property not physical?
30.
by 1718627440 15d ago
No, the branch who decides whether a specific execution follows the law is called the judiciary.

More ›