1101010010

7 ms·

1.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Yet reality defies your "reasonable" expectations.
2.
by 1101010010 3y ago
This is only the tip of the iceberg. A majority of the "user content" (product reviews, brand engagement, comments on social media sites, etc) is completely fake, bought for and paid by big money interest aka bots. No different th
3.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Simply put: limited liability, lobbying (political donations) and general ignorance of the subject matter by a majority of the population.
4.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Are there even IP cameras manufactured domestically to even choose? I have some inside my home (pointed at exterior doors; not inside bedrooms which seems borderline creepy and/or sadistic), but they're not connected to public net
5.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Social media access to user data (whether foreign or domestic) is bad, but it is a distraction from the real evil: behavioral management at scale. When you can target specific demographics and control what they see 8-10 hours of the day, yo
6.
by 1101010010 3y ago
> I'm starting to become fatigued > Causing anxiety The news is literally designed to do that to you. Stop consuming so much of it for your own mental well-being, and that of everyone else you interact with.
7.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Simply don't allow Javascript.
8.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Just buy tech used, save money and reduce dependence on slave labor. Swappa has been good for me.
9.
by 1101010010 3y ago
https://browserleaks.com/canvas Open it in a regular and "incognito" browser tab. This is a long term identifier of your browser which persists across cookie clearing, IP address changes and other ritualistic tote
10.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Most of the nefarious tracking is taking place via canvas fingerprinting these days, clearing cookies does nothing but make the unaware user feel good they're "doing something".
11.
by 1101010010 3y ago
People who use multiple "angry face" emojis to express themselves are generally moody, petulant and emotionally unfit to work among highly compensated engineers. Instead of whining, adapt and overcome the circumstances you recogni
12.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Manufactured outrage to distract from the far more sinister and subtle behavioral management constantly at work on google users.
13.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Externalizing responsibility is the cornerstone of postindustrial capitalism. To deny that privilege would collapse the entire system.
14.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Perhaps, but deviating from social norms and ubiquitous technologies multiplies scrutiny. Most efforts made to boost privacy actually often have the opposite effect, but this is a subtle nuance few will understand.
15.
by 1101010010 3y ago
How else do you expect they get your device on a surveillance list? Or do people honestly believe that the 0.001% of mobile phone users that unlock their bootloader for custom operating systems are not subject to additional scrutiny by big
16.
by 1101010010 3y ago
> There’s a big difference between identity keys and session keys. It makes total sense to use lots of throw away keys (this is how tls works) but making a new identity key for every message is madness. That's not what happens (new
17.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Can you name just one example of a US armed "militia" intimidating a voter?
18.
by 1101010010 3y ago
> If US army decided to commit genocide against even some subset of those citizens, do you really think said firearms would help much? It worked well for Afghanistan, also Vietnam.
19.
by 1101010010 3y ago
I'm trying to read it by asking you to cite something, but you have so far been unable to. "Lots of scenarios" is vague and you should be able to come up with at least a few specific examples to support your argument.
20.
by 1101010010 3y ago
None of what I said is anecdotal, but you only seem interested in the taste of licked boots, so this conversation is over.
21.
by 1101010010 3y ago
> Never sharing keys reduces the risk too. That's not up you, it's up to your adversary. > How much does rotating credentials reduce risk? Should I rotate once a year? Once a month? As frequently as possible. Signal for exam
22.
by 1101010010 3y ago
History and common sense. Name one genocide that happened against an armed civilian population.
23.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Which native peoples outgunned the US Army? Please provide a citation for such an outlandish claim.
24.
by 1101010010 3y ago
You asked for a citation, you were provided one. If you think 300 unarmed civilians being murdered by the government because of their race is "nothing" then there is nothing left to discuss. I am honestly worried about what you mi
25.
by 1101010010 3y ago
You can start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wounded_Knee_Massacre and follow with a middle school history book about Germany, China or about a dozen other nations.
26.
by 1101010010 3y ago
I'm not interested in discussing personal anecdotes, only factual history which is replete with examples of state-sponsored genocide and tyranny when the population is disarmed.
27.
by 1101010010 3y ago
> People with guns kill more people than people without guns. The irony of this statement is government is historically responsible for the most deaths as they are best armed. When technology like firearms are decentralized and more peop
28.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Even victims of an oppressive system have an obligation to resist and challenge it. Being fat may not be a choice, but it is a moral imperative to change.
29.
by 1101010010 3y ago
Blaming asymmetrically powerful technology before man's own perverted ego is simply misguided.
30.
by 1101010010 3y ago
> women would be less frequently oppressed. That does not logically follow; another technology would just as soon take the place of surveillance cameras (phone tracking, social stigma, stricter laws and punishment). It is the intent of t

More ›