100100010001

6 ms·

1.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Troy and Abed in the movie!
2.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Wouldn’t law enforcement getting away with crimes cause fear? It seems like it would show they are above the law and can act like bullies without repercussions. Admitting a mistake and trying to make it right will gain trust.
3.
by 100100010001 7y ago
I wouldn’t qualify using military grade equipment in Colorado for stealing two belts and a shirt justifiable.
4.
by 100100010001 7y ago
I disagree with the “tapping on the shoulder isn’t a bad behavior”. It is counterproductive as illustrated by the linked cartoon. https://heeris.id.au/2013/this-is-why-you-shouldnt-interrupt...
5.
by 100100010001 7y ago
I think devices need better security. Anything that JavaScript can access should be set to default values where they all equal null. Only once a user allows a certain website to access certain data will that data become available to that we
6.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Your proof is that you “personally know a lot of people who know and insist on not opting out”? That’s anecdotal evidence at best (aka not proof).
7.
by 100100010001 7y ago
If it is a fact then show me the proof. Just because people use a service doesn’t mean they have read the terms and conditions. Therefore, your anecdote is just that.
8.
by 100100010001 7y ago
No need! I’m not presenting a hypothetical survey’s results without evidence. The person I was responding to is, unless they actually have such a survey. I asked for it and no one answered. Therefore, until there is a time with supporting e
9.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Is this anecdotal or do you have empirical evidence?
10.
by 100100010001 7y ago
This is your opinion, unless you actually did a survey of violating a citizens privacy by big tech. Have you?
11.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Aside from physical communication, every other type is achievable through computers. Does that mean the only way to resolve a misunderstanding is through physical communication?
12.
by 100100010001 7y ago
An anti-gravity engine could be used to allow the use of quantum levitation to stabilize the craft in the earth’s magnetic field.
13.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Yea, I wouldn’t trust them. A person could make one small mistake on the application and then they are screwed. The Air Force can then force them to work for them or convict them of a crime. It seems like a way to coerce computer scientists
14.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Does that mean every government agent that broke the law and spied on American citizens should be deported?
15.
by 100100010001 7y ago
If coders are liable for a consumers use of the product, will that put other industries producers in jeopardy of legal trouble?
16.
by 100100010001 7y ago
There is a global function that just came out this year... voightKampff();
17.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Agreed. Web development seems more approachable and I think MySpace has a lot to do with that. Allowing users to post html and css on their profile was probably the best feature! I think it also made programming relatable to a lot of people
18.
by 100100010001 7y ago
This is ridiculous!!! Then again we have a legal system, not a justice system. The corrupt will continue bending laws to their advantage. The judge should be ashamed!
19.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Any car that relies solely on wireless communication to start isn’t well thought out.
20.
by 100100010001 7y ago
True, but there is still no physical way to turn the car on. Teslas rely on wireless communication to turn on. That seems like a poor design to me.
21.
by 100100010001 7y ago
1. That is your unthoughtful opinion not a fact. The intended purpose of a gun is destruction. That is a fact. 2. Did you notice you had to change the parameters? I was talking about the general purpose, but you didn’t like what I said and
22.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Cars have a purpose besides destruction. Guns don’t, and give individuals unproportionate power.
23.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Or the idea presented by Welch isn’t as common as the op thinks?
24.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Fair enough. I’m sorry. I’ve been pretty upset about the situation in the USA, and my last few post were definitely based on emotion rather than having a serious discussion. This isn’t a justification for the actions just an explanation of
25.
by 100100010001 7y ago
I’ve got five the majority are from the USA.
26.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Downvoting anonymously without justification seems cowardly.
27.
by 100100010001 7y ago
That doesn’t change anything. The 10th century is still 1019 years before this year. Just like 20th century fox means 1901-2000. I get what you are trying to say, but language is used to convey ideas. If the words you use to convey your ide
28.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Why the down votes? Which statement is false?
29.
by 100100010001 7y ago
Is anyone actually surprised? A person can’t trust any cloud service since it is under one entity! Google, amazon, and dropbox seem to have no qualms with the government’s big brother policy.
30.
by 100100010001 7y ago
No... the 10th century was 901-1000. A thousand years after means > 2000. So it happened in the past 19 years.

More ›