0xquad

19 ms·

1.
by 0xquad 5y ago
Per LA Times [ https://www.latimes.com/environment/newsletter/2021-12-16/ca... ] They propose to pay customers $0.05 / generated kWh instead of the $0.20-$0.30/kWh that customers pay in California.
2.
by 0xquad 5y ago
Californians can see what's happening with their grid at: https://www.caiso.com/TodaysOutlook/Pages/index.html
3.
by 0xquad 6y ago
The main problem with Prop 65 is that it was done by ballot proposition -- through California's initiative process. That is, the proposed law was voted up or down by the people AS IS. As opposed to being created through the normal le
4.
by 0xquad 6y ago
They aren't recommending you don't use DoH. Just that you don't allow individual apps to bypass your enterprise resolver. In fact I use the same strategy at home (with DoT) to enforce ad and tracker blocking. It's jus
5.
by 0xquad 6y ago
>Raw IPs can be used as well, but that doesn’t negate my point. And in fact if you have enterprise-wide visibility on DNS requests, you have the opportunity to detect the use of an IP that was not returned in a request. Making it immedi
6.
by 0xquad 6y ago
They are responding to the very recent emergence of applications (like Firefox) that (optionally) use their own encrypted DNS, thus bypassing the enterprise's ability to apply security policy based on DNS. (Visibility on DNS is also u
7.
by 0xquad 6y ago
Net net: what IME is best for a mainland Chinese user of Signal?
8.
by 0xquad 6y ago
Is there a database of already analyzed objects? For example, can I search on the sha256sum of my IoT device's firmware and see if someone else has done the heavy lifting?
9.
by 0xquad 6y ago
Given the features and cost, what are the likely class of suitable applications for Precursor? It looks like the guts of a typical (consumer) router e.g., or a set-top device, but maybe not a commodity IOT thing (overkill and cost) and cer
10.
by 0xquad 6y ago
> A 2020 version of this might be "why there aren't more Teslas." It's interesting how many electric car companies are active in China, most of which westerners haven't heard of. (Check for example the video of
11.
by 0xquad 6y ago
I generally support the EFF and think netizens need far more protections than they have, and those need to come through legislation. But I don't get why this mandated interoperability is a good idea. Mandating data portability is one
12.
by 0xquad 7y ago
Given the TERMS OF USE under TP-Link's privacy policy [ https://www.tp-link.com/us/about-us/privacy/ ] it seems like they consider it illegal to do any of this. Their terms, along with the "we don&
13.
by 0xquad 8y ago
The hobby is broad (and changing rapidly). The media and public conflate the different uses. It was mostly stodgy model airplane fliers who regulated themselves through a community group (Academy of Model Aeronautics), somewhat like how g
14.
by 0xquad 9y ago
Any idea why some hobby parts clearly shipped from Shenzhen come with Vanuatu franking? I.e. is the reason Chinese companies sometimes pretend to ship from Vanuatu related to postal agreements or something else (like other trade issues)?