0xdeadfa65

8 ms·

1.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
>I'm trying to tell you that your writing is unintelligible. You're free to ask me what point is giving you trouble. >I don't believe you. You know all his talking points by heart. Trump vomits more foul content than an
2.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
> 1. The data/emails were most likely stolen and the media was trying not to make the same mistake as reporting DNC hacked emails, which was a Russian intelligence operation. This is a complete assumption on their part if that happe
3.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
Do your links prevent the opposite argument from being made? I have heard more often that crime causes poverty. Also, the specific connection with crime and poverty inequality, not poverty itself.
4.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
They should not be receiving public funds if they are going to continue to produce ideologically inclined content. At this point, they are no different than a little neoliberal/progressive think tank. And an honest assessment of the co
5.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
Nope it was definitely a lie. Corporate journalist along with their connections in our intelligence institutions colluded to tarnish and bury the story before an election before it had a chance to be assessed properly. I understand not beli
6.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
And that’s why our intelligence apparatus is not a trusted source. Individuals within this institution are willing to game their status for reputation and sell it to the highest bidder. Look how the Pentagon is handling the leak of the Ukra
7.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
The story was mentioned as an example of NPR editorializing. What is your point?
8.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
Do you not see how this is editorializing? They refuse to cover story having to do with the son of the Democratic candidate. And they pretended the story was not real.
9.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
This is quite a terrible take, considering the story has been proven to be true. Your sarcastic tone really annoys me since the media spent half a year, pretending the story wasn’t real.
10.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
You can commit atrocious evil without reaping rewards. It is extremely doubtful that Mao contributed any good. Read any book like Mao’s Great Famine or any other book detailing Maos life and exploits. He was a psychopath who refused to admi
11.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
Yes but there are many wannabe aspirants competing to be the next Mao
12.
by 0xdeadfa65 3y ago
Was this supposed to be a gotcha?
13.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
I had the same response. What exactly should I be outraged about?
14.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
You like changing your language because you convinced yourself that you’re part of the crew getting to make the changes. Just wait until you’re on the receiving end. Or even better forced to speak a different language, you don’t know, which
15.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
I think you missed the point completely. Rioting affects the political and cultural ambience of our times. It does not need to affect you directly or be a nuisance in your local communities for one to voice displeasure. Your take feels very
16.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
Is this a gotcha comment? Organized does not necessarily mean brimming with marketing material about their organizational structure. Antifa obviously has members and planning. They make great effort to counter who they perceive to be their
17.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
Can't help but feel this article was written in bad-faith. It feels desperate to counter the narrative of rising crime being an issue. Truth is crime has risen in the last couple of years and it has resulted in the severe deterioration
18.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
I guess they wouldn't. I honestly don't know how to get public discourse back on track to an appreciation for truth. I can only hope the partisans that weaponized social media as their pet angry mob eventually get their comeuppanc
19.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
It’s crazy to me that there is still people that refuse to acknowledge the collusion. I imagine it’s because they perceive a benefit from this arrangement and see it as an opportunity to hurt their political rivals. Good luck getting them t
20.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
Thank you for this comment. Too much gleeful malice distracting from the message.
21.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
Thank you for the laugh. I’m not convinced though that this is not their though process.
22.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
Thank you for the very thoughtful comment. The required login I think is enough to scare me off. Which is a shame. It’s the first time I’ve heard of this terminal and the features listed intrigue me enough to want to explore more.
23.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
I have to burst your bubble here. Conservative institutions suffer from much less child abuse accounts than progressive, "leftist" institutions. If you want a good example, compare rates of child abuse between the Catholic Church
24.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
I am too but I don’t think you’ll get it, even on HN. Good luck though
25.
by 0xdeadfa65 4y ago
This comment is the perfect storm of all things pernicious with a lot of modern discourse I see surrounding wokeism. Let's see; * liberal interpretation of the word "voluntary," * presenting Nikole Hanna Jones as a martyr for
26.
by 0xdeadfa65 7y ago
The cynical part of me says this is done intentionally for politically posturing.
27.
by 0xdeadfa65 7y ago
I wish I shared your optimism.
28.
by 0xdeadfa65 7y ago
This was libel... There was an intentional effort by the college to smear the bakery as racist and hurt their business. What does this have to do with the First Amendment?