0xBA5ED

5 ms·

1.
by 0xBA5ED 4mo ago
You actually changed what I said then declared it nonsense. I said abuse, not use.
2.
by 0xBA5ED 4mo ago
You're saying that spending time in jail is roughly equivalent to being a victim of attempted murder.
3.
by 0xBA5ED 4mo ago
Which specific cities are you referring to that have better outcomes and which ones have worse outcomes?
4.
by 0xBA5ED 4mo ago
Not a great solution, honestly. Long term drug abuse is almost never a victimless habit. I'm tempted to say never.
5.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
Maybe it is. I guess I was offering my perspective on dividing "real" things from the rest of it and got on a tangent there.
6.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
They seem to be getting quite comfortable altering the terms of use without notifying users.
7.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
To function. You must assume many things on a daily basis to function and survive because we are limited.
8.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
I'd argue we must go with these assumptions out of necessity rather than convenience. I don't have any broad strokes to offer on western thought, however.
9.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
Well if you can't concede that anything is real, that sort of makes you crazy doesn't it? A tree is real. But the concept of a tree and the word "tree" and all the ideas you have about the tree and what tree means, is th
10.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
"It defines a separation between computation and experience" Does it? Or does it separate two forms of computation (or two forms of experience)? Isn't it just saying a GPU can't be a brain and a brain can't be a GPU
11.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
So the question is a word problem. The first and last sentences are present tense, the rest is past tense so it's all red herring. The answer really should be 17. BUT if you do the math, 8-12 is actually right. I was finding that Sonne
12.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
A concise problem that requires actual logic will naturally seem a bit convoluted, but an intelligent being can sit down and work it out logically. Anyway, it's not an argument. It's empirical evidence that supports my argument. Y
13.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
Let's see it.
14.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
No, it's a real question. And if it were a math question. The neighbor has 18 animals, only 4 of which are dogs. The farmer receives 1/3 of those which is 6. So for the farmer to receive 0 sheep would require the farmer to receive
15.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
And that's the wrong answer. It's a word problem, not a math problem. Also, if it really was a math problem, it wouldn't be 0-6 sheep from the neighbor, it would be 2-6. So it even failed on the math.
16.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
One thing that will always be true is it will need context from somewhere to get started. When it comes to the context of what you want, you will either need to give that directly, or give it blanket access to everything on your devices for
17.
Can your AI solve this? Be honest
1 points by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago|5 comments
18.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
That's convenient. But I have a challenge for you if you're brave enough to face your delusions. Paste this into your LLM of choice and see what happens: "A farmer has 17 sheep. 9 ran away. He then bought enough to double wha
19.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
1) I never said random 2) I never said cherry picking RARE meaningful text 3) It is not false in every example you gave just because you say that it is 4) If I didn't know better, I might think you're confused about what statistic
20.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
Now this I can agree with. One thing that is extremely important to maintain with this technology is nuanced perspective. Otherwise, it will lead you astray quickly. It's also a difficult thing for us to maintain.
21.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
Well, I don't believe the LLM solved those problems. I believe the user did. The LLM aggregated large amounts of information statistically, then the user read that and realized there was something to it and fixed it. Those accounts don
22.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
Consider that you don't want to hear "statistical generation" because it reminds you of the unchangeable nature of the underlying technology and its ultimate limitations that all the money and data centers in the world will n
23.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
It is still important to mention that because atoms have limitations and so do statistical generators. Plain and simple. People are walking around thinking organic brains are just statistical generators and they're gonna build AGI with
24.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
The student and his colleague did.
25.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
"But I'm also allergic to arguments like "they're just statistical text generators", because that truly does not capture what these things do or what their capabilities are." Umm, why doesn't it capture it
26.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
The LLM did not solve the problem.
27.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
And how about the creative rationalizations about how statistical text generation is actual intelligence? As if there is any intent or motive behind the words that are generated or the ability to learn literally any new thing after it has b
28.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
Yes, and it's incredibly wasteful.
29.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
You can also run a successful manufacturing company without considering environmental impact. A successful tobacco company without considering public health. A successful social media persona without considering cultural impact. A mobile ap
30.
by 0xBA5ED 5mo ago
They're within their legal rights to keep soiling their own game and public image. The original version of the game is mostly in the wild though and players don't care who's IP it is. New servers emerge all the time.

More ›