Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
0x500x79
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
0x500x79
29d ago
I think that the start of the article was interesting, then it goes down the path of middle managers being the root of all evil, just seems a bit like whiplash. I completely agree with building the wrong thing is the root cause of a lot of
2.
▲
by
0x500x79
1mo ago
Yep, it might work for one or two turns but I see it regress pretty quickly with instructions and/or CLAUDE.md. It has to be deeper.
3.
▲
by
0x500x79
1mo ago
I have a similar project that I have built and found great success with it storing things like coding standards, decisions, etc. One thing that is interesting during my work is that Codex and OpenCode using OpenAI models are REALLY good at
4.
▲
by
0x500x79
5mo ago
I have two comments. One this feels like anti-competitive behavior that should not be accepted or allowed. Two, how can people support this? There are multiple comments in this thread with comments along the line of: "Oh im sure they d
5.
▲
by
0x500x79
6mo ago
Pin your dependencies folks! Audit and don't upgrade to every brand new version.
6.
▲
by
0x500x79
6mo ago
Agree, for now im using dotagents by sentry to handle a lot of this.
7.
▲
by
0x500x79
6mo ago
Better uptime? https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-is-developing-altern...
8.
▲
by
0x500x79
6mo ago
> If any of our liberated code is found to infringe on the original license, we'll provide a full refund and relocate our corporate headquarters to international waters.* I love it. Brilliant satire that foreshadows the future.
9.
▲
by
0x500x79
6mo ago
Sell the solution. The Claude code review system is 15-25 dollars per-review!
10.
▲
by
0x500x79
7mo ago
Yep, except this time its "We will take the data that you are generating in order to tell everyone that you aren't necessary anymore".
11.
▲
by
0x500x79
7mo ago
Agree. It's the primary reason (IMO) that they are so bullish on forcing people to use claude code. The telemetry they get is very important for training.
12.
▲
by
0x500x79
7mo ago
I think it's a well balanced article. The Anthropic Marketing here has... not been. I think that it's a great signal of agent orchestration, logevity of tasks, etc, but the messaging is "Software is Over we built a C compiler
13.
▲
by
0x500x79
7mo ago
The telemetry from claude code must be immensely valuable for training. Using it is training your replacement!
14.
▲
by
0x500x79
8mo ago
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should." IMO it's funny, but not terribly useful. As long as people don't take it too seriously then it's j
15.
▲
by
0x500x79
8mo ago
Even their status page (which are usually gamed) shows two 9s over the past 90 days.
16.
▲
by
0x500x79
8mo ago
I use opencode with codex after all the shenanigans from anthropic recently. You might want to give that a shot!
17.
▲
by
0x500x79
8mo ago
I imagine Claude helped write this one.
18.
▲
by
0x500x79
8mo ago
DAU/MAU for IPO.
19.
▲
by
0x500x79
8mo ago
This is a common problem and you can find reports of it all over X, including from some influencers. Even outside of VSCode.
20.
▲
by
0x500x79
8mo ago
$1,000.00 of credits per-day?? $200,000 per year? Those are bonkers numbers for someone not performing at a high level (on-top of their salary). Do you know what they are doing?
21.
▲
by
0x500x79
9mo ago
I believe it is getting close to this. Things like this just take time though, and when this person talks to management/leadership they talk about how much they are producing and how everyone is blocking their work. So it becomes a cha
22.
▲
by
0x500x79
9mo ago
Agree, maintainability, security, standards, all of these are important to follow and there are usually reasons for these things existing. I also see AI coding tools violate "Chesterton's Fence" (and the pre-Chesterton's
23.
▲
by
0x500x79
9mo ago
I think there are two other things missing: Security and Maintainability. Working code that can never be touched again by a developer or requires an excessive amount of time to maintain is not part of a developers job either. Overall, this
24.
▲
by
0x500x79
9mo ago
I am currently going through this with someone in our organization. Unfortunately, this person is vibe coding completely, and even the PR process is painful: * The coding agent reverts previously applied feedback * Coding agent not followin
25.
▲
by
0x500x79
1y ago
deps.dev has a similar bigquery dataset across a couple more languages if someone wanted to do analysis across the other ecosystems they support.
26.
▲
by
0x500x79
1y ago
I think it's a bit of planned obsolescence as well. The 1080ti has been a monster with it's 11GB VRAM up until this generation. A lot of enthusiasts basically call out that Nvidia won't make that mistake again since it led to
27.
▲
by
0x500x79
1y ago
I had a PM at my company (with an engineering background) post AI generated slop in a ticket this week. It was very frustrating. We asked them: "Where is xyz code". It didn't exist, it was a hallucination. We asked them: &quo
28.
▲
by
0x500x79
1y ago
LLMs are doing a great job at generating syntactically correct output related to the prompt or task at hand. The semantics, hierarchy, architecture, abstraction, security, and maintainability of a code base is not being handled by LLMs gene
29.
▲
by
0x500x79
1y ago
I agree, but unfortunately it falls flat IME. The hype is too strong and being pushed by the Fab Five that is causing an unbearable wall to these conversations. I have these conversations on a day-to-day basis and you are labeled as a hater
30.
▲
by
0x500x79
1y ago
I think this is an easy thing to wrap my mind around (since I have been in both camps): AI can generate lots of code very quickly. AI does not generate code that follows taste and or best practices. So in cases where the task is small, easi
More ›