0dte

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by 0dte 13d ago

   I think a good toy example here could be a market on a coinflip. Let's say heads pays out $1 and tails pays out $0, and people can buy and sell contracts that resolve this way. Naively, people might think that this is a 50/50 outc
2. 2.▲
   by 0dte 1y ago

   yep, silly me
3. 3.▲
   by 0dte 1y ago

   I think western companies will be just fine -- Anthropic is settling because they illegally pirated books from LibGen back in 2021 and subsequently trained models on them. They realized this was an issue internally and pivoted to buying boo
4. 4.▲
   by 0dte 1y ago

   This notably wasn't one of the allegations levied against Anthropic, as Claude was accompanied by software that filtered any infringing outputs. From the relevant opinion finding Anthropic's use of the books to be fair use: >
5. 5.▲
   by 0dte 1y ago

   This is not exactly how it works. You're right that a big fund executing on a public market will incur (potentially excessive) impact, but the purpose of these private rooms is not to prevent trading against informed parties! Often, th
6. 6.▲
   Rationalizing Latency Competition in High-Frequency Trading(blog.headlandstech.com)

   1 points by 0dte 2y ago|0 comments
7. 7.▲
   by 0dte 2y ago

   I disagree with the author's first point–that the decrease in profitability of eBay middlemen due to more efficient algorithmic arbitrageurs is an example of overoptimization, creating negative social consequences through "hurting