0daystock

7 ms·

1.
by 0daystock 3y ago
You miss the point: reducing protein intake to the small required amount is what is optimal for health.
2.
by 0daystock 3y ago
Fad diet? Until recent history, and coincidentally before the prevalence of vast diet-related disease, most of the world lived on a mostly vegan diet. You are welcome to cite some of this advanced scientific evidence refuting McDougall or s
3.
by 0daystock 3y ago
Flawed argument because animals still eat 10x the amount of plants vegans do. So if plant suffering was a legitimate concern, one would still be vegan, which is a lifestyle to reduce harm to animals.
4.
by 0daystock 3y ago
A study by a pill manufacturer whose business is sickness, promoting a sick diet for more obedient consumer customers. Adult humans require surprisingly little protein. So little, in fact, it's virtually impossible to be protein defici
5.
by 0daystock 3y ago
False equivalence and other logical fallacies like it lead to all sorts of stupid and abhorrent human behaviors, two of which you just described.
6.
by 0daystock 3y ago
You seem capable of looking up the definition of "survival" on your own. Anyway, this discussion is not worth having on this oppressive site, because any controversial opinion is just flagged and censored by the majority of fragil
7.
by 0daystock 3y ago
I already said I agreed survival is justification for eating animals. But this is not survival, this is sport, because they have a choice to eat something other than animals and still thrive.
8.
by 0daystock 3y ago
That is not by accident. The history of gun control in the USA (and mostly elsewhere) is deeply rooted in racism and classism. The very idea of an armed minority challenging the status quo terrifies individuals living lives of relative priv
9.
by 0daystock 3y ago
There is one gun store in all of Mexico and a two-tier ownership/permitting system where only the oligarchy class actually has rights to arms. No wonder it isn't safe when the average person is deprived of the means to defend them
10.
by 0daystock 3y ago
Linux is not a "safe" operating system by any stretch of imagination. The only saving grace is the fact Linux users are not profitable to malware authors due to very low market share. Still, I think it's naive to view it as a
11.
by 0daystock 3y ago
Almost all happened in Latin America where individual rights, including to own and defend yourself with potent firearms, is severely limited (except for agents of the state). Without this fundamental ability and political right, lawful good
12.
by 0daystock 3y ago
No, I don't think anything is safe from a determined adversary with near-infinite resources, especially if they are specifically targeting you. This is a basic tenet of infosec.
13.
by 0daystock 3y ago
I can't even tell it's crappy. Just a blank screen with Javascript disabled. Sites aren't worth visiting if they don't care about usability and accessibility, and promptly get added to my shit-list of domains.
14.
by 0daystock 4y ago
Whatever, I'm not going to argue on HN. "passing laws to arm teachers" is hyperbolic and meant to rile up emotions and this effect couldn't be more obvious on GP.
15.
by 0daystock 4y ago
Actually I read the entire documentation and browsed the source code. https://www.talos.dev/v1.0/learn-more/philosophy/ "Security" section makes no mention of independent audits. It just boldly clai
16.
by 0daystock 4y ago
I'm sure this article will change the opinions of millions of people who watched Apple's TV spots gloating over PCs getting viruses and consequnently formed an opinion.
17.
by 0daystock 4y ago
You're being hyperbolic. > "arm the teachers" > a bill that would allow local school districts, if they so chose, to designate armed staff for school security and safety No one is forcing teachers to become armed.
18.
by 0daystock 4y ago
> Security: Talos reduces your attack surface: It's minimal, hardened and immutable. All API access is secured with mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication. So, no actual threat modelling, third party audits or integration and unit testing
19.
by 0daystock 4y ago
What exactly do you believe doing this will accomplish, other than cutting off access from a search engine?
20.
by 0daystock 4y ago
> Everyone blaming "meat" for global warming is just a shill for the petrol industry, distracting from the real cause (fossil fuels). Maybe because most of the petrol industry serves the animal agriculture industry and hundreds
21.
by 0daystock 4y ago
Why do you need to read books faster? What's the hurry?
22.
by 0daystock 4y ago
> How curious that we are so perfectly able to digest it and thrive from it! I wonder why so many other herbivores didn't get so lucky. Humans can also eat and digest shirts, pencils and small pieces of plastic. And you didn't
23.
by 0daystock 4y ago
Honest question: why are you afraid of soy?
24.
by 0daystock 4y ago
> Apple does not advertise that Macs don’t get viruses. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdF5IsyOxU4 It's even got the signature Apple infant background music.
25.
by 0daystock 4y ago
We need laws now to outlaw securities and commodities fraud, and other types of Ponzi schemes! On wait, those are already on the books.
26.
by 0daystock 4y ago
> Neither of these are bad for you, just don't be obese Every nutritional authority in the world disagrees. > Every bottle of kombucha I have ever seen has at most 16g of non-added sugar from fruits, the same as a banana Right, s
27.
by 0daystock 4y ago
Do preserved foods increase prostate cancer risk? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409746/ Vegetables, but not pickled vegetables, are negatively associated with the risk of breast cancer https:
28.
by 0daystock 4y ago
Let's hear some of this "common sense" regulation that will allegedly arrest scams and illicit schemes.
29.
by 0daystock 4y ago
> OSX and iOS have anti-malware tooling built in You ever seen them notify users of detection and remediation? Yeah, didn't think so. > Malwarebytes, Norton, McAfee etc. don’t accept liability for what their scans find Because t
30.
by 0daystock 4y ago
As predicted, they're all plant-based foods that beat cancer. No animal product has ever been shown to decrease cancer risk ever - only increase it. A strong argument for whole foods plant-based diets is evident.

More ›